From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 22:19:19 +0100 Subject: [Cocci] Source code analysis with big regular expressions? In-Reply-To: References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530CFF11.9090001@users.sourceforge.net> <530D02F3.7050804@users.sourceforge.net> Message-ID: <530D08D7.9040501@users.sourceforge.net> To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr > Those two lines at least are not from Coccinelle, so I guess that they are > from the PCRE implementation. Are there any chances to retrieve a more detailed error information? > The regular expression engine is just not likely to be designed to support > such a large regular expression. I would try to compare the processing of big patterns with similar interfaces from other software. > If you like you can give each of the function names one by one as a > command line argument. I imagine that this approach will result also in different opinions about a useful patch granularity. http://lwn.net/Articles/585782/ Regards, Markus