On 2014-06-29 16:27, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 04:01:04PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 04:42:47PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote: >>> Please do so and let us know. >> >> Yep, just did. Reverting ae9fedc793 fixes the issue. >> >>> reinj:1 means that previous injection failed due to another #PF that >>> happened during the event injection itself This may happen if GDT or fist >>> instruction of a fault handler is not mapped by shadow pages, but here >>> it says that the new page fault is at the same address as the previous >>> one as if GDT is or #PF handler is mapped there. Strange. Especially >>> since #DF is injected successfully, so GDT should be fine. May be wrong >>> cpl makes svm crazy? >> >> Well, I'm not going to even pretend to know kvm to know *when* we're >> saving VMCB state but if we're saving the wrong CPL and then doing the >> pagetable walk, I can very well imagine if the walker gets confused. One >> possible issue could be U/S bit (bit 2) in the PTE bits which allows >> access to supervisor pages only when CPL < 3. I.e., CPL has effect on >> pagetable walk and a wrong CPL level could break it. >> >> All a conjecture though... >> > Looks plausible, still strange that second #PF is at the same address as the first one though. > Anyway, not we have the commit to blame. I suspect there is a gap between cause and effect. I'm tracing CPL changes currently, and my first impression is that QEMU triggers an unwanted switch from CPL 3 to 0 on vmport access: qemu-system-x86-11883 [001] 7493.378630: kvm_entry: vcpu 0 qemu-system-x86-11883 [001] 7493.378631: bprint: svm_vcpu_run: entry cpl 0 qemu-system-x86-11883 [001] 7493.378636: bprint: svm_vcpu_run: exit cpl 3 qemu-system-x86-11883 [001] 7493.378637: kvm_exit: reason io rip 0x400854 info 56580241 400855 qemu-system-x86-11883 [001] 7493.378640: kvm_emulate_insn: 0:400854:ed (prot64) qemu-system-x86-11883 [001] 7493.378642: kvm_userspace_exit: reason KVM_EXIT_IO (2) qemu-system-x86-11883 [001] 7493.378655: bprint: kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_sregs: ss.dpl 0 qemu-system-x86-11883 [001] 7493.378684: bprint: kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs: ss.dpl 0 qemu-system-x86-11883 [001] 7493.378685: bprint: svm_set_segment: cpl = 0 qemu-system-x86-11883 [001] 7493.378711: kvm_pio: pio_read at 0x5658 size 4 count 1 val 0x3442554a Yeah... do we have to manually sync save.cpl into ss.dpl on get_sregs on AMD? Jan