From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shilimkar Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] cpufreq: cpu0: Move per-cluster initialization code to ->init() Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 11:29:44 -0400 Message-ID: <53BD5FE8.5040500@ti.com> References: <53BD576F.2010408@ti.com> <53BD5F0C.2050509@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:52454 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932566AbaGIPaF (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2014 11:30:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Shawn Guo , Nishanth Menon , Lists linaro-kernel , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , Tomasz Figa , Stephen Boyd , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thomas P Abraham , Arvind Chauhan , Sachin Kamat , Lorenzo Pieralisi On Wednesday 09 July 2014 11:27 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 9 July 2014 20:56, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>>> We still *don't* support platforms with separate clock/voltage lines for CPUs. >>>> This would be done in a separate patch. > > Probably s/separate/later would be enough to make you happy ? > For reviewer, its easy if this later is "in the current series" or really a "later" series. Anyway I understood it now, so its upto you. regards, Santosh