From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] arch/arm64: Enable PREEMPT_RT_FULL Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 09:18:26 +0200 Message-ID: <55599242.4020803@linutronix.de> References: <1430167990-12333-1-git-send-email-anders.roxell@linaro.org> <1430167990-12333-4-git-send-email-anders.roxell@linaro.org> <20150514155723.GD13442@linutronix.de> <20150515120810.GA10988@8074w.roxell.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ayyappa.ch.linux@gmail.com, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kevin.hilman@linaro.org To: Anders Roxell Return-path: Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:47546 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752117AbbERHS2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2015 03:18:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150515120810.GA10988@8074w.roxell.se> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/15/2015 02:08 PM, Anders Roxell wrote: > On 2015-05-14 17:57, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> * Anders Roxell | 2015-04-27 22:53:10 [+0200]: >> >>> arm64 is missing support for PREEMPT_RT. The main feature which is >>> lacking is support for lazy preemption. The arch-specific entry code, >> >> I'm taking this but I am renaming the subject. Lazy preempt is not >> required by -RT but supporting it benefits it. That means you could run >> arm64 without it. > > Thanks for picking up the patch and fixing the subject, > though I was surprised to see the ownership changed. Oh. The ownership ship changed only in #3 by mistake. I will fix it, sorry for that. > Cheers, > Anders Sebastian From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bigeasy@linutronix.de (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior) Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 09:18:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCHv2 3/3] arch/arm64: Enable PREEMPT_RT_FULL In-Reply-To: <20150515120810.GA10988@8074w.roxell.se> References: <1430167990-12333-1-git-send-email-anders.roxell@linaro.org> <1430167990-12333-4-git-send-email-anders.roxell@linaro.org> <20150514155723.GD13442@linutronix.de> <20150515120810.GA10988@8074w.roxell.se> Message-ID: <55599242.4020803@linutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 05/15/2015 02:08 PM, Anders Roxell wrote: > On 2015-05-14 17:57, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> * Anders Roxell | 2015-04-27 22:53:10 [+0200]: >> >>> arm64 is missing support for PREEMPT_RT. The main feature which is >>> lacking is support for lazy preemption. The arch-specific entry code, >> >> I'm taking this but I am renaming the subject. Lazy preempt is not >> required by -RT but supporting it benefits it. That means you could run >> arm64 without it. > > Thanks for picking up the patch and fixing the subject, > though I was surprised to see the ownership changed. Oh. The ownership ship changed only in #3 by mistake. I will fix it, sorry for that. > Cheers, > Anders Sebastian