From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
octavian.purdila@intel.com, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at fs/block_dev.c:58 __blkdev_put+0x16f/0x1b0()
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 13:07:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <563DE982.1070707@nod.at> (raw)
Hi!
While playing with the Linux kernel library I run into this warning.
Root cause of the warning is that the backing file on the host
side is locked an therefore all IO on it results into -EIO.
The question is whether ext4/jbd2 should abort earlier or not.
The WARN_ON_ONCE in bdev_write_inode() triggers as jbd2's do_one_pass()
sets up a dirty buffer_head and fails later.
Then ext4 gives up, calls blkdev_put() and we reach bdev_write_inode()
with a dirty ->bd_inode.
What do you think?
[ 0.128000] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 0
[ 0.128000] Buffer I/O error on dev vda, logical block 0, lost async page write
[ 0.128000] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 8
[ 0.128000] Buffer I/O error on dev vda, logical block 1, lost async page write
[ 0.128000] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 528
[ 0.128000] Buffer I/O error on dev vda, logical block 66, lost async page write
[ 0.128000] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 1824
[ 0.128000] Buffer I/O error on dev vda, logical block 228, lost async page write
[ 0.128000] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 1864
[ 0.128000] Buffer I/O error on dev vda, logical block 233, lost async page write
[ 0.128000] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 41840
[ 0.128000] Buffer I/O error on dev vda, logical block 5230, lost async page write
[ 0.128000] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 262672
[ 0.128000] Buffer I/O error on dev vda, logical block 32834, lost async page write
[ 0.128000] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 262680
[ 0.128000] Buffer I/O error on dev vda, logical block 32835, lost async page write
[ 0.128000] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 262752
[ 0.128000] Buffer I/O error on dev vda, logical block 32844, lost async page write
[ 0.128000] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev vda, sector 262792
[ 0.128000] Buffer I/O error on dev vda, logical block 32849, lost async page write
[ 0.132000] JBD2: recovery failed
[ 0.132000] EXT4-fs (vda): error loading journal
[ 0.132000] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 0.132000] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at fs/block_dev.c:58 __blkdev_put+0x16f/0x1b0()
[ 0.132000] Call Trace:
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262db68: [<0040673d>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7d/0xb0
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262dba8: [<004068d5>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x20
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262dbb8: [<0048efbf>] __blkdev_put+0x16f/0x1b0
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262dbf8: [<0048fcd2>] blkdev_put+0x92/0x110
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262dc28: [<00462faf>] kill_block_super+0x3f/0x70
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262dc48: [<00461bf2>] deactivate_locked_super+0x52/0xb0
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262dc78: [<00462f51>] mount_bdev+0x1b1/0x1d0
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262dc80: [<004c5c40>] ext4_fill_super+0x0/0x32f0
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262dce8: [<004c16f0>] ext4_mount+0x10/0x20
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262dcf8: [<00463164>] mount_fs+0x14/0xc0
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262dd28: [<0047a38e>] vfs_kern_mount+0x5e/0x120
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262dd78: [<0047baa8>] do_mount+0x208/0xd90
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262dd88: [<0045d7db>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x18b/0x1c0
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262dd98: [<00450618>] strndup_user+0x48/0x60
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262de08: [<00450618>] strndup_user+0x48/0x60
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262de48: [<0047c99a>] SyS_mount+0x6a/0xb0
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262de98: [<00403b89>] run_syscalls+0xd9/0x1c0
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262deb0: [<00425970>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262dec8: [<005535f0>] kernel_init+0x0/0xf0
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262dee8: [<005535f0>] kernel_init+0x0/0xf0
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262df08: [<00402f2d>] run_init_process+0x1d/0x40
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262df18: [<00553626>] kernel_init+0x36/0xf0
[ 0.132000] 00007fd99262df28: [<00403158>] thread_bootstrap+0x48/0x50
[ 0.132000]
[ 0.132000] ---[ end trace 0b886a9a044a4995 ]---
Thanks,
//richard
next reply other threads:[~2015-11-07 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-07 12:07 Richard Weinberger [this message]
2015-11-09 9:22 ` WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at fs/block_dev.c:58 __blkdev_put+0x16f/0x1b0() Jan Kara
2015-11-09 16:13 ` Jeff Moyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=563DE982.1070707@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=octavian.purdila@intel.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.