All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@google.com>,
	Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@google.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Limit number of items taken from the I/O scheduler in one go
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 07:26:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5707b17f-e5d7-c274-de6a-694098c4e9a2@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200206211222.83170-1-sqazi@google.com>

On 2020-02-06 13:12, Salman Qazi wrote:
> + *
> + * Returns true if hctx->dispatch was found non-empty and
> + * run_work has to be run again.

Please elaborate this comment and explain why this is necessary (to
avoid that flush processing is postponed forever).

> + * Returns true if hctx->dispatch was found non-empty and
> + * run_work has to be run again.

Same comment here.

> +again:
> +	run_again = false;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * If we have previous entries on our dispatch list, grab them first for
>  	 * more fair dispatch.
> @@ -208,19 +234,28 @@ void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>  		blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(hctx);
>  		if (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, false)) {
>  			if (has_sched_dispatch)
> -				blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
> +				run_again = blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
>  			else
> -				blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(hctx);
> +				run_again = blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(hctx);
>  		}
>  	} else if (has_sched_dispatch) {
> -		blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
> +		run_again = blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
>  	} else if (hctx->dispatch_busy) {
>  		/* dequeue request one by one from sw queue if queue is busy */
> -		blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(hctx);
> +		run_again = blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(hctx);
>  	} else {
>  		blk_mq_flush_busy_ctxs(hctx, &rq_list);
>  		blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, false);
>  	}
> +
> +	if (run_again) {
> +		if (!restarted) {
> +			restarted = true;
> +			goto again;
> +		}
> +
> +		blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, true);
> +	}

So this patch changes blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests() such that it
iterates at most two times? How about implementing that loop with an
explicit for-loop? I think that will make
blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests() easier to read. As you may know forward
goto's are accepted in kernel code but backward goto's are frowned upon.

Thanks,

Bart.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-07 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-30 19:34 Hung tasks with multiple partitions Salman Qazi
2020-01-30 20:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-01-30 21:02   ` Salman Qazi
     [not found]     ` <20200203204554.119849-1-sqazi@google.com>
2020-02-03 20:59       ` [PATCH] block: Limit number of items taken from the I/O scheduler in one go Salman Qazi
2020-02-04  3:47         ` Bart Van Assche
2020-02-04  9:20         ` Ming Lei
2020-02-04 18:26           ` Salman Qazi
2020-02-04 19:37             ` Salman Qazi
2020-02-05  4:55               ` Ming Lei
2020-02-05 19:57                 ` Salman Qazi
2020-02-06 10:18                   ` Ming Lei
2020-02-06 21:12                     ` Salman Qazi
2020-02-07  2:07                       ` Ming Lei
2020-02-07 15:26                       ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2020-02-07 18:45                         ` Salman Qazi
2020-02-07 19:04                           ` Salman Qazi
2020-02-07 20:19                           ` Bart Van Assche
2020-02-07 20:37                             ` Salman Qazi
2020-04-20 16:42                               ` Doug Anderson
2020-04-23 20:13                                 ` Jesse Barnes
2020-04-23 20:34                                   ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-23 20:40                                     ` Salman Qazi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5707b17f-e5d7-c274-de6a-694098c4e9a2@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=gwendal@google.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jsbarnes@google.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=sqazi@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.