Hello Alexandre,

On Sun, 2021-08-08 at 21:19 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On 06/08/2021 18:10:38+0200, Thomas Perrot wrote:
> > Otherwise the "required" property, from UBOOT_DTB_BINARY, will be set
> > to "conf"
> > and no error will be raised in case of error.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Perrot <thomas.perrot@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >  meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > --
> >  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> > b/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> > index a9d1002200c9..72f692e40e63 100644
> > --- a/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> > +++ b/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> > @@ -60,6 +60,14 @@ FIT_DESC ?= "Kernel fitImage for
> > ${DISTRO_NAME}/${PV}/${MACHINE}"
> >  # Sign individual images as well
> >  FIT_SIGN_INDIVIDUAL ?= "0"
> >  
> > +# Keys used to sign individually images nodes.
> > +# The keys to sign images nodes must be different from those used to
> > sign
> > +# configurations nodes, otherwise the "required" property, from
> > +# UBOOT_DTB_BINARY, will be set to "conf", because "conf" prevails
> > on "image".
> > +# Then images signature checking will not be mandatory and no error
> > will be
> > +# raised.
> > +# UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME = "dev2" # keys name in keydir (eg.
> > "dev2.crt", "dev2.key")
> > +
> >  #
> >  # Emit the fitImage ITS header
> >  #
> > @@ -121,7 +129,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_kernel() {
> >  
> >         kernel_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
> >         kernel_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
> > -       kernel_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
> > +       kernel_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
> >  
> >         ENTRYPOINT="${UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT}"
> >         if [ -n "${UBOOT_ENTRYSYMBOL}" ]; then
> > @@ -167,7 +175,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_dtb() {
> >  
> >         dtb_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
> >         dtb_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
> > -       dtb_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
> > +       dtb_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
> >  
> >         dtb_loadline=""
> >         dtb_ext=${DTB##*.}
> > @@ -214,7 +222,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_boot_script() {
> >  
> >          bootscr_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
> >         bootscr_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
> > -       bootscr_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
> > +       bootscr_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
> >  
> >          cat << EOF >> ${1}
> >                  bootscr-${2} {
> > @@ -278,7 +286,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_ramdisk() {
> >  
> >         ramdisk_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
> >         ramdisk_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
> > -       ramdisk_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
> > +       ramdisk_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}"
> >         ramdisk_loadline=""
> >         ramdisk_entryline=""
> >  
> > @@ -475,6 +483,10 @@ fitimage_assemble() {
> >         bootscr_id=""
> >         rm -f ${1} arch/${ARCH}/boot/${2}
> >  
> > +       if [ "${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}" = "${UBOOT_SIGN_IMG_KEYNAME}" ];
> > then
> > +               bbfatal "Keys used to sign images and configuration
> > nodes must be different."
> 
> This breaks oe-selftest, as seen in:
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/79/builds/2383/steps/14/logs/stdio
> 

Thank you for the feedback.

The tests also need to be updated, so I will submit a v2, including the
required changes on the test side.

Best regards,
Thomas Perrot

> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Thomas Perrot, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com