All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk>
To: David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>,
	Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@gmail.com>
Cc: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>,
	Jeff Allison <jeff.allison@allygray.2y.net>,
	Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@websitemanagers.com.au>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: proactive disk replacement
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:31:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58D14764.60909@youngman.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58D1381E.1080101@hesbynett.no>

On 21/03/17 14:26, David Brown wrote:
> It is possible that if there are a large number of UREs from a drive,
> that the RAID system will consider the whole drive bad and drop it.  But
> other than that, UREs will be treated independently.

Doesn't mdadm have a setting that does exactly that? Too many UREs and
the drive gets dropped? I'm sure I've come across that interfering with
rebuilds.

Cheers,
Wol

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-21 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-20 12:47 proactive disk replacement Jeff Allison
2017-03-20 13:25 ` Reindl Harald
2017-03-20 14:59 ` Adam Goryachev
2017-03-20 15:04   ` Reindl Harald
2017-03-20 15:23     ` Adam Goryachev
2017-03-20 16:19       ` Wols Lists
2017-03-21  2:33   ` Jeff Allison
2017-03-21  9:54     ` Reindl Harald
2017-03-21 10:54       ` Adam Goryachev
2017-03-21 11:03         ` Reindl Harald
2017-03-21 11:34           ` Andreas Klauer
2017-03-21 12:03             ` Reindl Harald
2017-03-21 12:41               ` Andreas Klauer
2017-03-22  4:16                 ` NeilBrown
2017-03-21 11:56           ` Adam Goryachev
2017-03-21 12:10             ` Reindl Harald
2017-03-21 13:13           ` David Brown
2017-03-21 13:24             ` Reindl Harald
2017-03-21 14:15               ` David Brown
2017-03-21 15:25                 ` Wols Lists
2017-03-21 15:41                   ` David Brown
2017-03-21 16:49                     ` Phil Turmel
2017-03-22 13:53                       ` Gandalf Corvotempesta
2017-03-22 14:12                         ` David Brown
2017-03-22 14:32                         ` Phil Turmel
2017-03-21 11:55         ` Gandalf Corvotempesta
2017-03-21 13:02       ` David Brown
2017-03-21 13:26         ` Gandalf Corvotempesta
2017-03-21 14:26           ` David Brown
2017-03-21 15:31             ` Wols Lists [this message]
2017-03-21 17:00               ` Phil Turmel
2017-03-21 15:29         ` Wols Lists
2017-03-21 16:55         ` Phil Turmel
2017-03-22 14:51 ` John Stoffel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58D14764.60909@youngman.org.uk \
    --to=antlists@youngman.org.uk \
    --cc=david.brown@hesbynett.no \
    --cc=gandalf.corvotempesta@gmail.com \
    --cc=h.reindl@thelounge.net \
    --cc=jeff.allison@allygray.2y.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mailinglists@websitemanagers.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.