All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: george.dunlap@citrix.com
Cc: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
	Tamas K Lengyel <tamas.lengyel@zentific.com>,
	aisaila@bitdefender.com,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mem_access: Fix npfec.kind propagation
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 01:04:35 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5BAC810302000078001EC6E9@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02c6bddf-933c-5348-73eb-25d6d826d30b@citrix.com>

>>> On 26.09.18 at 19:00, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 26/09/18 17:47, George Dunlap wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c
>> @@ -232,12 +232,12 @@ bool p2m_mem_access_check(paddr_t gpa, unsigned long gla,
>>          {
>>              req->u.mem_access.flags |= MEM_ACCESS_GLA_VALID;
>>              req->u.mem_access.gla = gla;
>> -
>> -            if ( npfec.kind == npfec_kind_with_gla )
>> -                req->u.mem_access.flags |= MEM_ACCESS_FAULT_WITH_GLA;
>> -            else if ( npfec.kind == npfec_kind_in_gpt )
>> -                req->u.mem_access.flags |= MEM_ACCESS_FAULT_IN_GPT;
>>          }
>> +
>> +        if ( npfec.kind == npfec_kind_with_gla )
>> +            req->u.mem_access.flags |= MEM_ACCESS_FAULT_WITH_GLA;
>> +        else if ( npfec.kind == npfec_kind_in_gpt )
>> +            req->u.mem_access.flags |= MEM_ACCESS_FAULT_IN_GPT;
> 
> Nit.  Newline here please, as it is not logically related with the block
> below.

And, despite it being just two comparisons, perhaps better to
make it a switch() at the same time?

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-27  7:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-26 16:47 [RFC PATCH 1/2] mem_access: Fix npfec.kind propagation George Dunlap
2018-09-26 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] x86/mm: Add mem access rights to NPT George Dunlap
2018-09-26 17:22   ` Andrew Cooper
2018-09-27 10:37     ` George Dunlap
2018-09-27 10:53       ` Paul Durrant
2019-01-09  9:30       ` Alexandru Stefan ISAILA
2018-09-27  9:38   ` Isaila Alexandru
2019-06-13 10:56   ` [Xen-devel] " Alexandru Stefan ISAILA
2019-06-17 10:48     ` George Dunlap
2019-06-17 11:58       ` Andrew Cooper
2019-06-13 15:19   ` Tamas Lengyel
2019-06-13 15:21     ` Razvan Cojocaru
2018-09-26 16:51 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] mem_access: Fix npfec.kind propagation Tamas Lengyel
2018-09-26 17:00 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-09-27  7:04   ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2018-09-27  8:46     ` George Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5BAC810302000078001EC6E9@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=aisaila@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=rcojocaru@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=tamas.lengyel@zentific.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.