All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Fix a race in the runtime power management code
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 20:27:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5da883fe-b5ec-b98d-ae0c-bc053b6e22cb@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200827203321.GB449067@rowland.harvard.edu>

On 2020-08-27 13:33, Alan Stern wrote:
> It may not need to be that complicated.  what about something like this?
> 
> Index: usb-devel/block/blk-core.c
> ===================================================================
> --- usb-devel.orig/block/blk-core.c
> +++ usb-devel/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -420,11 +420,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_cleanup_queue);
>  /**
>   * blk_queue_enter() - try to increase q->q_usage_counter
>   * @q: request queue pointer
> - * @flags: BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT and/or BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT
> + * @flags: BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT and/or BLK_MQ_REQ_PM
>   */
>  int blk_queue_enter(struct request_queue *q, blk_mq_req_flags_t flags)
>  {
> -	const bool pm = flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT;
> +	const bool pm = flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_PM;
>  
>  	while (true) {
>  		bool success = false;
> @@ -626,7 +626,8 @@ struct request *blk_get_request(struct r
>  	struct request *req;
>  
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(op & REQ_NOWAIT);
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(flags & ~(BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT | BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT));
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(flags & ~(BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT | BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT |
> +			BLK_MQ_REQ_PM));
>  
>  	req = blk_mq_alloc_request(q, op, flags);
>  	if (!IS_ERR(req) && q->mq_ops->initialize_rq_fn)
> Index: usb-devel/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> ===================================================================
> --- usb-devel.orig/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ usb-devel/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -245,11 +245,15 @@ int __scsi_execute(struct scsi_device *s
>  {
>  	struct request *req;
>  	struct scsi_request *rq;
> +	blk_mq_req_flags_t mq_req_flags;
>  	int ret = DRIVER_ERROR << 24;
>  
> +	mq_req_flags = BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT;
> +	if (rq_flags & RQF_PM)
> +		mq_req_flags |= BLK_MQ_REQ_PM;
>  	req = blk_get_request(sdev->request_queue,
>  			data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE ?
> -			REQ_OP_SCSI_OUT : REQ_OP_SCSI_IN, BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT);
> +			REQ_OP_SCSI_OUT : REQ_OP_SCSI_IN, mq_req_flags);
>  	if (IS_ERR(req))
>  		return ret;
>  	rq = scsi_req(req);
> Index: usb-devel/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> ===================================================================
> --- usb-devel.orig/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> +++ usb-devel/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> @@ -435,6 +435,8 @@ enum {
>  	BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED	= (__force blk_mq_req_flags_t)(1 << 1),
>  	/* set RQF_PREEMPT */
>  	BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT	= (__force blk_mq_req_flags_t)(1 << 3),
> +	/* used for power management */
> +	BLK_MQ_REQ_PM		= (__force blk_mq_req_flags_t)(1 << 4),
>  };
>  
>  struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int op,

I think this patch will break SCSI domain validation. The SCSI domain
validation code calls scsi_device_quiesce() and that function in turn calls
blk_set_pm_only(). The SCSI domain validation code submits SCSI commands with
the BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT flag. Since the above code postpones such requests
while blk_set_pm_only() is in effect, I think the above patch will cause the
SCSI domain validation code to deadlock.

Bart.



  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-28  3:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-24  3:06 [PATCH] block: Fix a race in the runtime power management code Bart Van Assche
2020-08-24 14:47 ` Alan Stern
2020-08-25  9:01 ` Stanley Chu
2020-08-25  9:11 ` Stanley Chu
2020-08-25 18:24   ` Alan Stern
2020-08-25 22:22     ` Bart Van Assche
2020-08-26  1:51       ` Alan Stern
2020-08-27  3:35         ` Bart Van Assche
2020-08-27 20:33           ` Alan Stern
2020-08-28  3:27             ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2020-08-28 15:37               ` Alan Stern
2020-08-29  0:51                 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-08-29  1:12                   ` Alan Stern
2020-08-29  2:57                     ` Bart Van Assche
2020-08-26  2:58   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-08-26  4:00     ` Stanley Chu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5da883fe-b5ec-b98d-ae0c-bc053b6e22cb@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.