From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com (mail-wm1-f68.google.com [209.85.128.68]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0C56C0F6 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 23:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id o10so15449787wmc.1 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:56:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=At8J10pyK50vPHfbU7rlw8K21NBK9dV5IYUf63qfjSE=; b=FEC8QVO/EQ1qNk90WBuT2uR0YxdJmgUKgjekw7F3sE50FxUkecXkE+RhLrpO9v2wy9 g169R3+375KtL5Q4OJhd8vjMeBDja/6MN4ppOh5EirJum9mnBoz+f5WOOmBYTrubIl21 hMXZn3MZx/yRPFbHcPfM8kuQBZZ12BDfUU/1M= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=At8J10pyK50vPHfbU7rlw8K21NBK9dV5IYUf63qfjSE=; b=gi4LkE5D/X6iZqbi86zCP1Kwnb536atGcfhk7uh1i9endQDHhH2Txjo6kaG5B0li42 jsfD1Pp0lL1jD1ilxR6wtLxvcz4c15gz8V/cAUZJ1lXrEWUs1tiDxoI++gQO3yXZukgo L2EAvYBjvlAQodrAHNBtcmesoSP4ACXuMkrw8vW8J+V595ObU1ropT6219EZi3F943CA ZbtmIYfU20V5QLdiFuqUXwZ+oFUZzaKquidVHNefsbceQ8aG+aCe14av7KBw2NF14j8M L7iNRI7Ot4nXhllDn542ouoNX1knCfnocAojsZo67oxGoIfXYbU+vxiKbP++SH7RGyiL T9OQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVyeglHguNNRSgbjc4lo38UJE9B6rDbBSG0XUWNHaSwERjwhlqW Uof7ZU8oXzlf4BIaDj97RtJGWQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzrsKXGksS3vlocrjseY40RAXiHxXrZjmB/NJBBhPYvqDSPhMr9fjVWu9ms4fEmsvn+pqF9Fw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:66c2:: with SMTP id a185mr1026681wmc.139.1552953406487; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:56:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hex (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com. [87.81.244.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v9sm27278768wrg.84.2019.03.18.16.56.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:56:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5ebe88235599c79c6f125e327bf321f9e3c30700.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Andre McCurdy Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 23:56:44 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <20190318133618.4022-1-otavio@ossystems.com.br> User-Agent: Evolution 3.31.90-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Otavio Salvador , OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] openssl: Use the c_rehash shell re-implementation for target X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 23:56:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2019-03-18 at 16:52 -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:35 PM Richard Purdie > wrote: > > I went to have a look at how this upstream C utility was going and > > found that they've moved to github issues and there is no such > > issue > > open. > > It's already been implemented and is present in openssl 1.1.0: > > https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.1.0/man1/rehash.html Great, it felt like I was missing something! Otavio: Why do we need c_rehash on target at all, can we use rehash? Cheers, Richard