All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Mathias Kunter <mathiaskunter@gmail.com>,
	Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git push doesn't use local branch name as default
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 12:52:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <60b12dc1f19b1_5190820879@natae.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9f38d42-2b93-0d3b-798b-4c6f44eb111d@gmail.com>

Mathias Kunter wrote:
> > you only get the "current" behavior when fetch_remote is non-NULL.
> 
> Well, then my suggestion actually is to also use the `current` behavior 
> when fetch_remote is NULL - i.e. change
> 
> > return (fetch_remote && fetch_remote != remote);
> 
> to
> 
> > return (!fetch_remote || fetch_remote != remote);

It's not quite that easy. You need to see the context of that code:

  static int is_workflow_triangular(struct remote *remote)
  {
    struct remote *fetch_remote = remote_get(NULL);
    return (fetch_remote && fetch_remote != remote);
  }

That would affect many pathways.

> I'd argue that if `simple` pushing is used, then the expected behavior 
> of the command
> 
> > git push <remote_name>
> 
> on a branch without upstream would actually be to use the `current` 
> behavior instead of bailing out with an error.

I agree, but this mis-mash of modes makes the logic very hard to see.

I'll send patches to cleanup the logic, it makes no sense to have a
frankenstein of two modes and that is in fact the default mode. The
logic of the default mode should be crystal clear.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-28 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <3b9bc214-a30a-ba49-af96-7eeaf37b7bbd@gmail.com>
2021-05-28  6:29 ` git push doesn't use local branch name as default Mathias Kunter
2021-05-28  7:00   ` Elijah Newren
2021-05-28  7:44     ` Mathias Kunter
2021-05-28  8:51       ` Mathias Kunter
2021-05-28 21:12         ` git push default doesn't make sense Felipe Contreras
2021-05-30 16:28           ` Mathias Kunter
2021-05-30 16:32             ` Felipe Contreras
2021-05-28 17:52       ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2021-05-28 17:22     ` git push doesn't use local branch name as default Felipe Contreras
2021-05-28 17:44       ` Elijah Newren
2021-05-28 18:58         ` Felipe Contreras
2021-05-28 17:10   ` Felipe Contreras
2021-05-27 17:06 Mathias Kunter
2021-05-27 19:51 ` Felipe Contreras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=60b12dc1f19b1_5190820879@natae.notmuch \
    --to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathiaskunter@gmail.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.