All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	"ohad@wizery.com" <ohad@wizery.com>,
	"bjorn.andersson@linaro.org" <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/17] remoteproc: Add support for detaching a rproc
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 10:21:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <64b559dc-9e89-c351-ddee-f9cebd155ed7@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201218173228.2277032-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

Hi Mathieu

On 12/18/20 6:32 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Following the work done here [1], this set provides support for the
> remoteproc core to release resources associated with a remote processor
> without having to switch it off. That way a platform driver can be removed
> or the application processor power cycled while the remote processor is
> still operating.
> 
> Of special interest in this series are patches 5 and 6 where getting the
> address of the resource table installed by an eternal entity if moved to
> the core.  This is to support scenarios where a remote process has been
> booted by the core but is being detached.  To re-attach the remote
> processor, the address of the resource table needs to be known at a later
> time than the platform driver's probe() function.
> 
> Applies cleanly on v5.10
> 
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
> 
> [1]. https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/14/1600
> 
> ----
> New for v4:
> - Made binding description OS agnostic (Rob)
> - Added functionality to set the external resource table in the core
> - Fixed a crash when detaching (Arnaud)
> - Fixed error code propagation in rproc_cdev_relase() and rproc_del() (Arnaud)
> - Added RB tags


I tested you series, attach and  detach is working well.

Then I faced issue when tried to re-attach after a detach.

But I don't know if this feature has to be supported in this step.

The 2 issues I found are:

1) memory carveouts are released on detach so need to be reinitialized.
The use of prepare/unprepare for the attach and detach would solve the issue but
probably need to add parameter to differentiate a start/stop from a attach/detach.

2) The vrings in the loaded resource table (so no cached) has to be properly
reinitialized. In rproc_free_vring  the vring da is set to 0 that is then
considered as a fixed address.

Here is a fix which works on the stm32 platform

@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ void rproc_free_vring(struct rproc_vring *rvring)
 	 */
 	if (rproc->table_ptr) {
 		rsc = (void *)rproc->table_ptr + rvring->rvdev->rsc_offset;
-		rsc->vring[idx].da = 0;
+		rsc->vring[idx].da = FW_RSC_ADDR_ANY;
 		rsc->vring[idx].notifyid = -1;
 	}
 }

Here, perhaps a better alternative would be to make a cached copy on attach
before updating it. On the next attach, the cached copy would be copied as it is
done in rproc_start.

Thanks,
Arnaud


> 
> Mathieu Poirier (17):
>   dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindind to support autonomous processors
>   remoteproc: Re-check state in rproc_shutdown()
>   remoteproc: Remove useless check in rproc_del()
>   remoteproc: Rename function rproc_actuate()
>   remoteproc: Add new get_loaded_rsc_table() remoteproc operation
>   remoteproc: stm32: Move resource table setup to rproc_ops
>   remoteproc: Add new RPROC_ATTACHED state
>   remoteproc: Properly represent the attached state
>   remoteproc: Properly deal with a kernel panic when attached
>   remoteproc: Add new detach() remoteproc operation
>   remoteproc: Introduce function __rproc_detach()
>   remoteproc: Introduce function rproc_detach()
>   remoteproc: Add return value to function rproc_shutdown()
>   remoteproc: Properly deal with a stop request when attached
>   remoteproc: Properly deal with a start request when attached
>   remoteproc: Properly deal with detach request
>   remoteproc: Refactor rproc delete and cdev release path
> 
>  .../bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc-core.yaml  |  27 +++
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c          |  32 ++-
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c          | 211 +++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h      |   8 +
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_sysfs.c         |  20 +-
>  drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c              | 147 ++++++------
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h                    |  24 +-
>  7 files changed, 344 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/remoteproc-core.yaml
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-27  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-18 17:32 [PATCH v4 00/17] remoteproc: Add support for detaching a rproc Mathieu Poirier
2020-12-18 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindind to support autonomous processors Mathieu Poirier
2021-01-20 15:53   ` Rob Herring
2020-12-18 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] remoteproc: Re-check state in rproc_shutdown() Mathieu Poirier
2020-12-18 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] remoteproc: Remove useless check in rproc_del() Mathieu Poirier
2020-12-18 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] remoteproc: Rename function rproc_actuate() Mathieu Poirier
2020-12-18 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] remoteproc: Add new get_loaded_rsc_table() remoteproc operation Mathieu Poirier
2021-01-27  8:44   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-01-29 21:37     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-12-18 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] remoteproc: stm32: Move resource table setup to rproc_ops Mathieu Poirier
2020-12-18 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] remoteproc: Add new RPROC_ATTACHED state Mathieu Poirier
2020-12-18 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] remoteproc: Properly represent the attached state Mathieu Poirier
2020-12-18 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] remoteproc: Properly deal with a kernel panic when attached Mathieu Poirier
2020-12-18 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] remoteproc: Add new detach() remoteproc operation Mathieu Poirier
2020-12-18 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] remoteproc: Introduce function __rproc_detach() Mathieu Poirier
2021-01-27  8:46   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-01-29 22:17     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-12-18 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] remoteproc: Introduce function rproc_detach() Mathieu Poirier
2021-01-27  8:50   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-01-29 22:31     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-12-18 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] remoteproc: Add return value to function rproc_shutdown() Mathieu Poirier
2020-12-18 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] remoteproc: Properly deal with a stop request when attached Mathieu Poirier
2020-12-18 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] remoteproc: Properly deal with a start " Mathieu Poirier
2020-12-18 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] remoteproc: Properly deal with detach request Mathieu Poirier
2020-12-18 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] remoteproc: Refactor rproc delete and cdev release path Mathieu Poirier
2021-01-27  8:56   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-01-27  9:21 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN [this message]
2021-02-02  0:49   ` [PATCH v4 00/17] remoteproc: Add support for detaching a rproc Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-02  8:54     ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-02-02 22:42       ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-02-03  7:58         ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2021-02-08 23:43           ` Mathieu Poirier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=64b559dc-9e89-c351-ddee-f9cebd155ed7@st.com \
    --to=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.