All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

diff for duplicates of <66b377bd-999f-9010-8257-95f663f4ebd2@arm.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index deabf39..84d8a18 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ On 18/04/17 19:51, Juergen Gross wrote:
 >>>>> Sure, go ahead. I won't object.
 >>>>
 >>>> For the Xen on ARM side, the original patch that started this thread
->>>> (20170405181417.15985-1-julien.grall@arm.com) is good to go, right?
+>>>> (20170405181417.15985-1-julien.grall-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org) is good to go, right?
 >>>>
 >>>
 >>> As I said: the dummy xen_efi_reset_system() should be in
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index fdad55b..6612daf 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -47,7 +47,10 @@
   "ref\0b9238471-6957-8720-9c98-37a5a32776d2\@suse.com\0"
 ]
 [
-  "From\0Julien Grall <julien.grall\@arm.com>\0"
+  "ref\0b9238471-6957-8720-9c98-37a5a32776d2-IBi9RG/b67k\@public.gmane.org\0"
+]
+[
+  "From\0Julien Grall <julien.grall-5wv7dgnIgG8\@public.gmane.org>\0"
 ]
 [
   "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] arm64: xen: Implement EFI reset_system callback\0"
@@ -56,19 +59,19 @@
   "Date\0Thu, 20 Apr 2017 19:09:29 +0100\0"
 ]
 [
-  "To\0Juergen Gross <jgross\@suse.com>",
-  " Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini\@kernel.org>\0"
+  "To\0Juergen Gross <jgross-IBi9RG/b67k\@public.gmane.org>",
+  " Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A\@public.gmane.org>\0"
 ]
 [
-  "Cc\0Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper\@oracle.com>",
-  " Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky\@oracle.com>",
-  " xen-devel\@lists.xen.org",
-  " linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org",
-  " linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org>",
-  " Mark Rutland <mark.rutland\@arm.com>",
-  " ard.biesheuvel\@linaro.org",
-  " linux-efi\@vger.kernel.org",
-  " matt\@codeblueprint.co.uk\0"
+  "Cc\0Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA\@public.gmane.org>",
+  " Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA\@public.gmane.org>",
+  " xen-devel-GuqFBffKawuEi8DpZVb4nw\@public.gmane.org",
+  " linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r\@public.gmane.org",
+  " linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA\@public.gmane.org <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA\@public.gmane.org>",
+  " Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8\@public.gmane.org>",
+  " ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A\@public.gmane.org",
+  " linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA\@public.gmane.org",
+  " matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io\@public.gmane.org\0"
 ]
 [
   "\0000:1\0"
@@ -168,7 +171,7 @@
   ">>>>> Sure, go ahead. I won't object.\n",
   ">>>>\n",
   ">>>> For the Xen on ARM side, the original patch that started this thread\n",
-  ">>>> (20170405181417.15985-1-julien.grall\@arm.com) is good to go, right?\n",
+  ">>>> (20170405181417.15985-1-julien.grall-5wv7dgnIgG8\@public.gmane.org) is good to go, right?\n",
   ">>>>\n",
   ">>>\n",
   ">>> As I said: the dummy xen_efi_reset_system() should be in\n",
@@ -193,4 +196,4 @@
   "Julien Grall"
 ]
 
-6bd4fd8c0f3d4a233faa4aac212572ad9c5dd15a78e6ebfe1536a3441904890d
+675bc4dd87927b23386c302d327d3f02eb9f926ae081816cacfe9675b8a3b2b0

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index deabf39..8f2c35d 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ On 18/04/17 19:51, Juergen Gross wrote:
 >>>>> Sure, go ahead. I won't object.
 >>>>
 >>>> For the Xen on ARM side, the original patch that started this thread
->>>> (20170405181417.15985-1-julien.grall@arm.com) is good to go, right?
+>>>> (20170405181417.15985-1-julien.grall at arm.com) is good to go, right?
 >>>>
 >>>
 >>> As I said: the dummy xen_efi_reset_system() should be in
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index fdad55b..97fccc3 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -47,28 +47,16 @@
   "ref\0b9238471-6957-8720-9c98-37a5a32776d2\@suse.com\0"
 ]
 [
-  "From\0Julien Grall <julien.grall\@arm.com>\0"
+  "From\0julien.grall\@arm.com (Julien Grall)\0"
 ]
 [
-  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] arm64: xen: Implement EFI reset_system callback\0"
+  "Subject\0[PATCH] arm64: xen: Implement EFI reset_system callback\0"
 ]
 [
   "Date\0Thu, 20 Apr 2017 19:09:29 +0100\0"
 ]
 [
-  "To\0Juergen Gross <jgross\@suse.com>",
-  " Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini\@kernel.org>\0"
-]
-[
-  "Cc\0Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper\@oracle.com>",
-  " Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky\@oracle.com>",
-  " xen-devel\@lists.xen.org",
-  " linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org",
-  " linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org>",
-  " Mark Rutland <mark.rutland\@arm.com>",
-  " ard.biesheuvel\@linaro.org",
-  " linux-efi\@vger.kernel.org",
-  " matt\@codeblueprint.co.uk\0"
+  "To\0linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org\0"
 ]
 [
   "\0000:1\0"
@@ -168,7 +156,7 @@
   ">>>>> Sure, go ahead. I won't object.\n",
   ">>>>\n",
   ">>>> For the Xen on ARM side, the original patch that started this thread\n",
-  ">>>> (20170405181417.15985-1-julien.grall\@arm.com) is good to go, right?\n",
+  ">>>> (20170405181417.15985-1-julien.grall at arm.com) is good to go, right?\n",
   ">>>>\n",
   ">>>\n",
   ">>> As I said: the dummy xen_efi_reset_system() should be in\n",
@@ -193,4 +181,4 @@
   "Julien Grall"
 ]
 
-6bd4fd8c0f3d4a233faa4aac212572ad9c5dd15a78e6ebfe1536a3441904890d
+215da020b49dea8683c365fe504b9357ba5d481be79883648ab85637e96a97fd
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.