All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
	abologna@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com
Cc: mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aik@ozlabs.ru,
	bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1/2] pseries: Split CAS PVR negotiation out into a separate function
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 10:55:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7252247d-ce4d-0e7d-7078-5d0d4af2d658@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170517063547.23876-2-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

On 17/05/2017 08:35, David Gibson wrote:
> Guests of the qemu machine type go through a feature negotiation process
> known as "client architecture support" (CAS) during early boot.  This does
> a number of things, one of which is finding a CPU compatibility mode which
> can be supported by both guest and host.
> 
> In fact the CPU negotiation is probably the single most complex part of the
> CAS process, so this splits it out into a helper function.  We've recently
> made some mistakes in maintaining backward compatibility for old machine
> types here.  Splitting this out will also make it easier to fix this.
> 
> This also adds a possibly useful error message if the negotiation fails
> (i.e. if there is CPU mode that's suitable for both guest and host).
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
>  hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> index 0d608d6..007ae8d 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
> @@ -1047,19 +1047,13 @@ static target_ulong h_signal_sys_reset(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>      }
>  }
>  
> -static target_ulong h_client_architecture_support(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> -                                                  sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> -                                                  target_ulong opcode,
> -                                                  target_ulong *args)
> +static uint32_t cas_check_pvr(PowerPCCPU *cpu, target_ulong list,
> +                              Error **errp)
>  {
> -    target_ulong list = ppc64_phys_to_real(args[0]);
> -    target_ulong ov_table;
>      bool explicit_match = false; /* Matched the CPU's real PVR */
>      uint32_t max_compat = cpu->max_compat;
>      uint32_t best_compat = 0;
>      int i;
> -    sPAPROptionVector *ov1_guest, *ov5_guest, *ov5_cas_old, *ov5_updates;
> -    bool guest_radix;
>  
>      /*
>       * We scan the supplied table of PVRs looking for two things
> @@ -1090,26 +1084,43 @@ static target_ulong h_client_architecture_support(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>          /* We couldn't find a suitable compatibility mode, and either
>           * the guest doesn't support "raw" mode for this CPU, or raw
>           * mode is disabled because a maximum compat mode is set */
> -        return H_HARDWARE;
> +        error_setg(errp, "Couldn't negotiate a suitable PVR during CAS");
> +        return 0;
>      }
>  
>      /* Parsing finished */
>      trace_spapr_cas_pvr(cpu->compat_pvr, explicit_match, best_compat);
>  
> -    /* Update CPUs */
> -    if (cpu->compat_pvr != best_compat) {
> -        Error *local_err = NULL;
> +    return best_compat;
> +}
> +
> +static target_ulong h_client_architecture_support(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> +                                                  sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> +                                                  target_ulong opcode,
> +                                                  target_ulong *args)
> +{
> +    /* @ov_table points to the first option vector */
> +    target_ulong ov_table = ppc64_phys_to_real(args[0]);
> +    uint32_t cas_pvr;
> +    sPAPROptionVector *ov1_guest, *ov5_guest, *ov5_cas_old, *ov5_updates;
> +    bool guest_radix;
> +    Error *local_err = NULL;
>  
> -        ppc_set_compat_all(best_compat, &local_err);
> +    cas_pvr = cas_check_pvr(cpu, ov_table, &local_err);
> +    if (local_err) {
> +        error_report_err(local_err);
> +        return H_HARDWARE;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* Update CPUs */
> +    if (cpu->compat_pvr != cas_pvr) {
> +        ppc_set_compat_all(cas_pvr, &local_err);
>          if (local_err) {
>              error_report_err(local_err);
>              return H_HARDWARE;
>          }
>      }
>  
> -    /* For the future use: here @ov_table points to the first option vector */
> -    ov_table = list;
> -

I think there is a change here: now ov_table is always
ppc64_phys_to_real(args[0]), as it is not updated by cas_check() as list
was by h_client_architecture_support().

>      ov1_guest = spapr_ovec_parse_vector(ov_table, 1);
>      ov5_guest = spapr_ovec_parse_vector(ov_table, 5);
>      if (spapr_ovec_test(ov5_guest, OV5_MMU_BOTH)) {

Laurent

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-17  8:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-17  6:35 [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/2] pseries: Correct behaviour change for older machine types David Gibson
2017-05-17  6:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1/2] pseries: Split CAS PVR negotiation out into a separate function David Gibson
2017-05-17  8:55   ` Laurent Vivier [this message]
2017-05-17 15:56   ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " Greg Kurz
2017-05-18  4:37     ` David Gibson
2017-05-17  6:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 2/2] pseries: Restore PVR negotiation logic for pre-2.9 machine types David Gibson
2017-05-17  9:21   ` Laurent Vivier
2017-05-17 16:32   ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " Greg Kurz
2017-05-17  8:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/2] pseries: Correct behaviour change for older " Andrea Bolognani
2017-05-18  4:51   ` David Gibson
2017-05-18  6:58     ` Andrea Bolognani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7252247d-ce4d-0e7d-7078-5d0d4af2d658@redhat.com \
    --to=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=abologna@redhat.com \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.