From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm: Two small fixes for recent syzbot reports
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 22:12:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <76e8bbed-21d1-22e1-4148-5a5766652c0d@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9C21961E-24D3-4C97-A5AB-B70451E4F952@lca.pw>
On 2020/04/10 6:14, Qian Cai wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 9, 2020, at 2:06 PM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:58 AM Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> wrote:
>>>
>>> Agree to make a big deal part. My point is that when kicking trees of linux-next, it also could reduce the exposure of many patches (which could be bad) to linux-next and miss valuable early testing either from robots or human.
>>
>> Sure. But I'd want to be notified when something gets kicked out, so
>> that I then know not to pull it.
>>
>> So it would reduce the exposure of patches, but it would also make
>> sure those patches then don't make it upstream.
>>
>> Untested patches is fine - as long as nobody else has to suffer through them.
>
> Excellent. It now very much depends on how Stephen will notify you when
> a tree, a patchset or even a developer should be blacklisted for some time
> to make this a success.
>
Since patch flow forms tree structure, I don't know whether maintainers can
afford remembering which tree, patchset or developer should be blacklisted
when problems come from leaf git trees.
By the way...
Removing problematic trees might confuse "#syz test:" request, for
developers might ask syzbot to test proposed patches on a kernel which
does not contain problematic trees. In lucky case, test request fails
as patch failure or build failure. But in unlucky case, syzbot fails to
detect that proposed patch was tested on a kernel without problematic
trees. A bit related to https://github.com/google/syzkaller/issues/1609 .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-10 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-08 1:40 [PATCH 0/2] mm: Two small fixes for recent syzbot reports Peter Xu
2020-04-08 1:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/mempolicy: Allow lookup_node() to handle fatal signal Peter Xu
2020-04-08 10:21 ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-08 14:20 ` Peter Xu
2020-04-08 14:30 ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-08 15:24 ` Peter Xu
2020-04-08 15:26 ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-09 7:02 ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-09 12:52 ` Peter Xu
2020-04-09 13:00 ` Peter Xu
2020-04-09 13:53 ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-09 16:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 16:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-14 11:04 ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-14 13:49 ` Peter Xu
2020-04-14 14:18 ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-20 12:47 ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-20 17:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-20 17:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-21 7:09 ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-08 1:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/gup: Mark lock taken only after a successful retake Peter Xu
2020-04-09 0:47 ` [PATCH 0/2] mm: Two small fixes for recent syzbot reports Andrew Morton
2020-04-09 11:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-04-09 13:00 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-04-09 13:00 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-04-09 18:16 ` Andrew Morton
2020-04-09 18:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 18:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 19:12 ` Andrew Morton
2020-04-09 19:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 19:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 19:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-04-09 19:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 19:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 20:27 ` Eric Biggers
2020-04-09 20:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 20:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 23:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-10 1:11 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-04-09 12:55 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-04-09 12:55 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-04-09 16:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 16:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 16:58 ` Qian Cai
2020-04-09 17:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 17:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 17:58 ` Qian Cai
2020-04-09 18:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 18:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-04-09 21:14 ` Qian Cai
2020-04-10 13:12 ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2020-04-10 14:26 ` Qian Cai
2020-04-10 17:26 ` Andrew Morton
2020-04-10 19:46 ` Qian Cai
2020-04-09 23:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-13 22:06 ` Qian Cai
2020-04-13 23:05 ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-14 11:12 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-04-14 11:12 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-04-14 11:59 ` Qian Cai
2020-04-14 12:05 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-04-14 12:05 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-04-14 19:28 ` Dan Rue
2020-04-15 11:09 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-04-15 11:09 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-04-15 16:23 ` Dan Rue
2020-04-16 0:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-11 15:29 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-05-11 15:29 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-04-14 4:07 ` Hillf Danton
2020-04-14 4:31 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=76e8bbed-21d1-22e1-4148-5a5766652c0d@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.