All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org,
	virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, virtio@lists.oasis-open.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio] [PATCH] virtio: clarify feature negotiation
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 16:28:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lewharyk.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfET8pNaYoWZ6eFt@myrica>

[sorry about resurrecting an undead thread; I'm trying to collect some
editorial changes]

On Wed, Jan 26 2022, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:42:35PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> So from that point of view, we are actually relaxing the requirements,
>> and yes we'll need to carefully go over each instance of
>> "offered".
>> I thought I did, but now I did a quick grep again and I found instances
>> in virtio-iommu.tex and virtio-gpio.tex
>> Both of these are new, so I think we can just fix them to "negotiated".
>> 
>> Jean-Philippe, Viresh, what do you think? Would it be a problem to
>> replace offered with negotiated, and restrict iommu and gpio drivers to
>> access config space after FEATURES_OK?
>
> No problem for iommu. The config space fields domain_range and input_range
> are not useful to the driver before DRIVER_OK. Reading field bypass
> earlier could be useful for debugging, but in that case going a few more
> steps into device initialization wouldn't hurt.

For domain_range and input_range, offered->negotiated looks like the
right thing to do. However, I'm a bit unsure about bypass. We currently
have:

"
An endpoint is in bypass mode if:
\begin{itemize}
  \item the VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS_CONFIG feature is offered and:
    \begin{itemize}
      \item config field \field{bypass} is 1 and the endpoint is
        not attached to a domain. This applies even if the driver
        does not accept the VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS_CONFIG feature
        and the device initializes field \field{bypass} to 1.

        or
      \item the endpoint is attached to a domain with
        VIRTIO_IOMMU_ATTACH_F_BYPASS.
    \end{itemize}
"

The "This applies even if..." clause refers to "offered, but not
accepted". I assume we want to do offered->negotiated even here, but
wanted to double-check.


This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/


  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-07 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-14 22:50 [virtio-dev] [PATCH] virtio: clarify feature negotiation Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-17 15:39 ` Cornelia Huck
2022-01-17 22:26   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-19 12:23     ` Halil Pasic
2022-01-19 16:20       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-19 17:50         ` [virtio] " Cornelia Huck
2022-01-19 23:48           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-20 12:39             ` [virtio-comment] " Cornelia Huck
2022-01-20 15:07               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-20 15:24             ` Halil Pasic
2022-01-19 12:23 ` [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio] " Halil Pasic
2022-01-19 16:34   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-20 13:05     ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2022-01-20 16:52       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-21  2:38       ` Halil Pasic
2022-01-21 16:05         ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2022-01-24 16:40           ` Halil Pasic
2022-01-24 21:42             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-25 14:57               ` [virtio] " Cornelia Huck
2022-01-25 18:05                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-26  9:27               ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-04-07 14:28                 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2022-04-07 14:58                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-26 15:10               ` Halil Pasic
2022-01-25 15:22             ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2022-01-26 14:14               ` Halil Pasic
2022-01-21  3:17     ` Halil Pasic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lewharyk.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=virtio@lists.oasis-open.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.