From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E7ABC433EF for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 05:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35026 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nby4o-0004g3-3z for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 01:19:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41728) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nby47-0003vU-DK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 01:18:47 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:31157) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nby44-0007PW-OR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 01:18:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1649222323; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zOQabAnp3/wHshlfjDJwzaYMHmwEVnW2nYvSuUtN49s=; b=XiBlrsYpOD07mnNhxCxS17E7U06srzVaAcU8FVxZXrW8ckaUuANhjON9BvePsFysiYOJLT ltt1b5jOU0+mVY3C4G5RKkv82Hsqzii9pbz8i+22XzISja0DyhSi6EpyRWZ5j787KswEs1 +PzmxXda9ivxeEALzH1MviUdI7RO8Pc= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-176-fmNzcWBHNdGhN71Gg7UQAw-1; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 01:18:42 -0400 X-MC-Unique: fmNzcWBHNdGhN71Gg7UQAw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6D021C05AC7; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 05:18:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (unknown [10.36.112.3]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBCB9C27D98; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 05:18:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6F9E821E6A00; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 07:18:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: John Snow Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] python: add qmp-send program to send raw qmp commands to qemu References: <20220316095455.6473-1-damien.hedde@greensocs.com> <3d52da6c-124d-4de6-432d-be9e0bb16dfe@greensocs.com> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2022 07:18:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: (John Snow's message of "Tue, 5 Apr 2022 14:08:11 -0400") Message-ID: <87tub623in.fsf@pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.8 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=armbru@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.082, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Damien Hedde , Beraldo Leal , Daniel Berrange , qemu-devel , Cleber Rosa Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" John Snow writes: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2022, 5:03 AM Damien Hedde > wrote: [...] >> If it stays in QEMU tree, what licensing should I use ? LGPL does not >> hurt, no ? >> > > Whichever you please. GPLv2+ would be convenient and harmonizes well with > other tools. LGPL is only something I started doing so that the "qemu.qmp" > package would be LGPL. Licensing the tools as LGPL was just a sin of > convenience so I could claim a single license for the whole wheel/egg/tgz. > > (I didn't want to make separate qmp and qmp-tools packages.) > > Go with what you feel is best. Any license other than GPLv2+ needs justification in the commit message. [...]