All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

diff for duplicates of <AANLkTikJvcpECTpRU-JA2YX8QFYPHV7PMkN5w49ji2TH@mail.gmail.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index ef2f6b8..e8ec067 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ On 15 November 2010 22:11, Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> wrote:
 >> On 15 November 2010 09:47, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
 >> > On Monday 15 November 2010 10:39:30 Catalin Marinas wrote:
 >> >> > There will be compiler warnings because u32 is unsigned int, and we
->> >> > print it as %08lx.  Generic code cases pte values to (long long) and
->> >> > prints them using %08llx.  We should do the same.
+>> >> > print it as %08lx. ?Generic code cases pte values to (long long) and
+>> >> > prints them using %08llx. ?We should do the same.
 >> >>
 >> >> We still need some kind of macro because with LPAE we need %016llx
 >> >> since the phys address can go to 40-bit and there are some additional
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ On 15 November 2010 22:11, Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> wrote:
 > to have a minimum of 10 zero-paded digits if the value is smaller than
 > that.
 >
-> However, not having aligned values will be confusing.  A macro for the
+> However, not having aligned values will be confusing. ?A macro for the
 > format might be the best compromize.
 
 We thought about using something like
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 0e7d2e5..752b924 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -17,23 +17,16 @@
   "ref\0alpine.LFD.2.00.1011151707310.6448\@xanadu.home\0"
 ]
 [
-  "From\0Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas\@arm.com>\0"
+  "From\0catalin.marinas\@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)\0"
 ]
 [
-  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 03/20] ARM: LPAE: use u32 instead of unsigned long for 32-bit ptes\0"
+  "Subject\0[PATCH v2 03/20] ARM: LPAE: use u32 instead of unsigned long for 32-bit ptes\0"
 ]
 [
   "Date\0Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:19:22 +0000\0"
 ]
 [
-  "To\0Nicolas Pitre <nico\@fluxnic.net>\0"
-]
-[
-  "Cc\0Arnd Bergmann <arnd\@arndb.de>",
-  " Russell King - ARM Linux <linux\@arm.linux.org.uk>",
-  " linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org>",
-  " linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org>",
-  " Will Deacon <will.deacon\@arm.com>\0"
+  "To\0linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org\0"
 ]
 [
   "\0000:1\0"
@@ -48,8 +41,8 @@
   ">> On 15 November 2010 09:47, Arnd Bergmann <arnd\@arndb.de> wrote:\n",
   ">> > On Monday 15 November 2010 10:39:30 Catalin Marinas wrote:\n",
   ">> >> > There will be compiler warnings because u32 is unsigned int, and we\n",
-  ">> >> > print it as %08lx. \302\240Generic code cases pte values to (long long) and\n",
-  ">> >> > prints them using %08llx. \302\240We should do the same.\n",
+  ">> >> > print it as %08lx. ?Generic code cases pte values to (long long) and\n",
+  ">> >> > prints them using %08llx. ?We should do the same.\n",
   ">> >>\n",
   ">> >> We still need some kind of macro because with LPAE we need %016llx\n",
   ">> >> since the phys address can go to 40-bit and there are some additional\n",
@@ -66,7 +59,7 @@
   "> to have a minimum of 10 zero-paded digits if the value is smaller than\n",
   "> that.\n",
   ">\n",
-  "> However, not having aligned values will be confusing. \302\240A macro for the\n",
+  "> However, not having aligned values will be confusing. ?A macro for the\n",
   "> format might be the best compromize.\n",
   "\n",
   "We thought about using something like\n",
@@ -83,4 +76,4 @@
   "Catalin"
 ]
 
-2f5c91592e635a929f8b0ae58f1299ea5d23ba6315b428b3c36999fb6912c99e
+d3e0a948388acba3f0809d165ac58b0ca4e5cf110e501e8eb7313451152074fa
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.