From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933236Ab0JRUYl (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:24:41 -0400 Received: from antispam02.maxim-ic.com ([205.153.101.183]:53361 "EHLO antispam02.maxim-ic.com.maxim-ic.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756250Ab0JRUYk convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:24:40 -0400 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1287433480-6caeaa340001-xx1T2L X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: Peter.Hsiang@maxim-ic.com From: Peter Hsiang To: Stephen Rothwell , Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood CC: "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:25:12 -0700 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree Subject: RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree Thread-Topic: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree Thread-Index: ActudMcSaRxcrltrS46MWBst//AmkQAi/n8w Message-ID: References: <20101018142934.65f5d0fa.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20101018142934.65f5d0fa.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Oct 2010 20:25:03.0147 (UTC) FILETIME=[8B83A7B0:01CB6F02] X-Barracuda-Connect: terlingua.dalsemi.com[180.0.34.46] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1287433480 X-Barracuda-URL: http://AntiSpam02.maxim-ic.com:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 17, 2010, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the sound-asoc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > sound/soc/codecs/max98088.c:28:28: error: sound/max98088.h: No such file or > directory > Mark, This message seems to be saying that this header file is missing. However, this header file was included in the patch that was submitted, and it did compile fine here before the submit. I don't understand why it's not there after it was applied? Thanks, Peter