From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Bedia, Vaibhav" Subject: RE: [RFC v2 07/18] ARM: OMAP2+: AM33XX: hwmod: Update TPTC0 hwmod with the right flags Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:56:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1356959231-17335-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.bedia@ti.com> <1356959231-17335-8-git-send-email-vaibhav.bedia@ti.com> <87fw12xw70.fsf@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:60793 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932451Ab3BMK5C convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2013 05:57:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87fw12xw70.fsf@linaro.org> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Kevin Hilman Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "tony@atomide.com" , "Shilimkar, Santosh" , "Cousson, Benoit" , Paul Walmsley , "Hiremath, Vaibhav" Hi Kevin, On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 05:03:23, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Vaibhav Bedia writes: > > > TPTC0 needs to be idled and put to standby under SW control. > > Please elaborate about why (e.g. HW support not available, HW support > broken/buggy, etc.) since these blocks are not well documented in the > docs that I have (spruh73f.) > This change was picked up for v3.9. I'll submit a follow-up patch adding in a comment in the hwmod file for this. Regards, Vaibhav From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vaibhav.bedia@ti.com (Bedia, Vaibhav) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:56:50 +0000 Subject: [RFC v2 07/18] ARM: OMAP2+: AM33XX: hwmod: Update TPTC0 hwmod with the right flags In-Reply-To: <87fw12xw70.fsf@linaro.org> References: <1356959231-17335-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.bedia@ti.com> <1356959231-17335-8-git-send-email-vaibhav.bedia@ti.com> <87fw12xw70.fsf@linaro.org> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Kevin, On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 05:03:23, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Vaibhav Bedia writes: > > > TPTC0 needs to be idled and put to standby under SW control. > > Please elaborate about why (e.g. HW support not available, HW support > broken/buggy, etc.) since these blocks are not well documented in the > docs that I have (spruh73f.) > This change was picked up for v3.9. I'll submit a follow-up patch adding in a comment in the hwmod file for this. Regards, Vaibhav