From: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH rdma-next 07/10] IB/mlx5: Return appropriate error code instead of ENOMEM
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 16:01:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY5PR12MB43220FA2D87A12FEBA246227DCB59@BY5PR12MB4322.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210202152109.GA617190@nvidia.com>
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 8:51 PM
> >
> > xa_lock(&imr->implicit_children);
> > - /*
> > - * Once the store to either xarray completes any error unwind has to
> > - * use synchronize_srcu(). Avoid this with xa_reserve()
> > - */
>
> It is not wrong to remove this comment, but why is it in this patch?
>
> Jason
Hi Leon,
Can you please check your tree, how this hunk got merged in this patch?
In my internal gerrit submission, I do not have this hunk.
May be somehow it got here as part of Yishai's ODP srcu patches?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-02 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-27 15:00 [PATCH rdma-next 00/10] Various cleanups Leon Romanovsky
2021-01-27 15:00 ` [PATCH rdma-next 01/10] IB/mlx5: Move mlx5_port_caps from mlx5_core_dev to mlx5_ib_dev Leon Romanovsky
2021-01-27 15:00 ` [PATCH rdma-next 02/10] IB/mlx5: Avoid calling query device for reading pkey table length Leon Romanovsky
2021-02-01 10:19 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-01-27 15:00 ` [PATCH rdma-next 03/10] IB/mlx5: Support default partition key for representor port Leon Romanovsky
2021-01-27 15:00 ` [PATCH rdma-next 04/10] IB/mlx5: Improve query port " Leon Romanovsky
2021-01-27 15:00 ` [PATCH rdma-next 05/10] RDMA/core: Introduce and use API to read port immutable data Leon Romanovsky
2021-02-02 16:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-02 18:05 ` Parav Pandit
2021-02-02 18:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-02 19:00 ` Parav Pandit
2021-01-27 15:00 ` [PATCH rdma-next 06/10] IB/mlx5: Use rdma_for_each_port for port iteration Leon Romanovsky
2021-01-27 15:00 ` [PATCH rdma-next 07/10] IB/mlx5: Return appropriate error code instead of ENOMEM Leon Romanovsky
2021-02-02 15:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-02 16:01 ` Parav Pandit [this message]
2021-02-02 18:57 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-01-27 15:00 ` [PATCH rdma-next 08/10] IB/cm: Avoid a loop when device has 255 ports Leon Romanovsky
2021-01-27 15:00 ` [PATCH rdma-next 09/10] IB/mlx4: Use port iterator and validation APIs Leon Romanovsky
2021-01-27 15:00 ` [PATCH rdma-next 10/10] IB/core: Use valid port number to check link layer Leon Romanovsky
2021-02-02 23:35 ` [PATCH rdma-next 00/10] Various cleanups Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-03 5:47 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BY5PR12MB43220FA2D87A12FEBA246227DCB59@BY5PR12MB4322.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.