From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756924Ab3BRSMZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:12:25 -0500 Received: from mail-ve0-f171.google.com ([209.85.128.171]:63683 "EHLO mail-ve0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756763Ab3BRSMY (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:12:24 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130218155324.GA5816@somewhere.redhat.com> References: <20130213193411.GA15928@redhat.com> <20130215011503.GA11914@redhat.com> <20130215174435.GA2792@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130218155324.GA5816@somewhere.redhat.com> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:12:03 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 25_Ovc7qHrWdJQy50V1FoI097r0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Debugging Thinkpad T430s occasional suspend failure. To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Paul McKenney , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Dave Jones , Hugh Dickins , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Paul McKenney Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > Here is an updated version. It cleans up things a bit and boots fine with my usual > config. There might be still some small details to work on but here is the big picture. > > What do you think? Looks fine to me. Did this get tested with lockdep and spinlock debugging etc? Those are the ones that are the primary users of all the irq state and preempt tracing.. Linus