From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755503AbbAJWH0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jan 2015 17:07:26 -0500 Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.216.47]:33297 "EHLO mail-qa0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752760AbbAJWHZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jan 2015 17:07:25 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1420927210-19738-4-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com> References: <1420927210-19738-1-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com> <1420927210-19738-4-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 14:07:24 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1cMoa9M26Frb9Jvw0DzstX7xND8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86: open-code register save/restore in trace_hardirqs thunks From: Linus Torvalds To: Denys Vlasenko Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Oleg Nesterov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Frederic Weisbecker , X86 ML , Alexei Starovoitov , Will Drewry , Kees Cook Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > + pushq_cfi %rdi > + CFI_REL_OFFSET rdi, 0 > + pushq_cfi %rsi > + CFI_REL_OFFSET rsi, 0 > + pushq_cfi %rdx > + CFI_REL_OFFSET rdx, 0 .. Ugh. This is too ugly, it needs to die. Why doesn't pushq_cfi do that CFI_REL_OFFSET thing? And if there is some good reason why, then please let's just make sure that there is a sane way to write pushes and pops, without having that insane CFI crap for every single damn case. Because this is unreadable. Linus