From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753509AbcJCXR6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2016 19:17:58 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f68.google.com ([209.85.218.68]:35579 "EHLO mail-oi0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751764AbcJCXRv (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2016 19:17:51 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 16:17:49 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: kwwaDP3s-F-kMtG6itg2rLBacwU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ABI CHANGE!!! Remove questionable remote SP reads To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Andy Lutomirski , X86 ML , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Brian Gerst , Borislav Petkov , Jann Horn , Linux API , Kees Cook , Tycho Andersen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > Ping! > > We need to decide fairly soon whether to apply these (or perhaps just > patch 1 or just patches 2 and 3) for 4.9. For any parts that aren't > applied, I'll send quick fixups to pin the stack in the offending > code. I think we should apply it. Hopefully nothing uses it, and nobody will notice. And if somebody *does* notice, the sooner we find out, the better. Linus From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ABI CHANGE!!! Remove questionable remote SP reads Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 16:17:49 -0700 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Andy Lutomirski , X86 ML , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Brian Gerst , Borislav Petkov , Jann Horn , Linux API , Kees Cook , Tycho Andersen List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > Ping! > > We need to decide fairly soon whether to apply these (or perhaps just > patch 1 or just patches 2 and 3) for 4.9. For any parts that aren't > applied, I'll send quick fixups to pin the stack in the offending > code. I think we should apply it. Hopefully nothing uses it, and nobody will notice. And if somebody *does* notice, the sooner we find out, the better. Linus