From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
To: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@gmail.com>
Cc: emamd001@umn.edu, smccaman@umn.edu, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>,
QCA ath9k Development <ath9k-devel@qca.qualcomm.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"<netdev@vger.kernel.org>" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: release allocated buffer if timed out
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 09:56:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+ASDXMnp-GTkrT7B5O+dtopJUmGBay=Tn=-nf1LW1MtaVOr+w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190906185931.19288-1-navid.emamdoost@gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:59 AM Navid Emamdoost
<navid.emamdoost@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In ath9k_wmi_cmd, the allocated network buffer needs to be released
> if timeout happens. Otherwise memory will be leaked.
>
> Signed-off-by: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@gmail.com>
I wonder, did you actually test your patches? I ask, because it seems
that all your patches are of the same mechanical variety (produced by
some sort of research project?), and if I look around a bit, I see
several mistakes and regressions noted on your other patches. And
recently, I see someone reporting a 5.4 kernel regression, which looks
a lot like it was caused by this patch:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207703#c1
I'll propose a revert, if there's no evidence this was actually tested
or otherwise confirmed to fix a real bug.
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-12 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-06 18:59 [PATCH] ath9k: release allocated buffer if timed out Navid Emamdoost
2019-09-10 13:32 ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-12 16:56 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2020-05-13 3:24 ` Navid Emamdoost
2020-05-13 19:12 ` Brian Norris
2020-05-13 7:05 ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-13 19:02 ` Brian Norris
2020-05-20 20:59 ` Brian Norris
2020-05-22 10:34 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+ASDXMnp-GTkrT7B5O+dtopJUmGBay=Tn=-nf1LW1MtaVOr+w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=ath9k-devel@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=emamd001@umn.edu \
--cc=kjlu@umn.edu \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=navid.emamdoost@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=smccaman@umn.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.