From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.90_1) id 1lVpwl-0003Fa-OB for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 02:21:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33388) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVpwk-0003FR-By for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 02:21:18 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x133.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::133]:43943) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVpwi-0001TE-QW for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 02:21:18 -0400 Received: by mail-il1-x133.google.com with SMTP id d2so10009719ilm.10 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 23:21:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dowhile0-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kf0L47uYm2xcwAhbLBUfaxUp7HMvJ7HWR+Enc1Q+NgU=; b=ev/w/S9WNiP+LbUkRmsPWdF4rbfzvB8IdMns13DT7aEe4F7IlFnifTcRvEiE8104UJ tUrp7Z6GAPNzyYqhM+FKXXbvWFk2B4V3ns15AJgZXq9SZCeUgnB3qfF5s5PDl6k4923X fjRx0wxbe3ATF+q17BHyPW5xmFY//BgjucdgxWBj5MMs2pmIAfv3GifqFlJEokxCIAe2 jvpavukRaPpTZCriubeP3qrXIDYt4xsI/K811XZ4ii7qDQ8OdOobBQh0fdCifxnatO+7 KK//xc82mkkT614607WaaVVPZ/vSxTM4QNe29Mv45+pLHOU127idB4HAT4f34bJctsB6 QMug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=kf0L47uYm2xcwAhbLBUfaxUp7HMvJ7HWR+Enc1Q+NgU=; b=qcNbkObsBATSBOFUF2LdxoRqZ/rkrHzhwZdFJ1PbNxeoQ06jEUgfh/OzJVAVdFWV02 v69xcQ4e2Oo128LpsE+yOoVrP4KaMKGXJVIM1I5wOybPUpbKN2JTadFkYL7GNTgK55c4 QkQVIr1aCkgmrk4uz8mxdkMH7rxx33s9ci5gOyFBeE7lFhE+swZobafKl/6fpZ0M5osw HlqpnbZdUvmmNALCW1r+5ph5BZe/jUk83IbtC+Uqqwlct9OIWOe04uwJesUlfa+9AmGw ubF8Wrx1tdcCkRz8/Y7x1lpr9NywYMV0m8J4WhhqvW9/jB3oZS/XFaKkkEnZouBNuoah 0PHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5312T+CjLLtSjAG53yF5Le0G0DEQtjGajQuekz/6PmJ1mTWIlWw8 eeUlkaOKkvI5Hg74cvhFf6gCW6pnaGsXy1r9R7kohZTwhpRlPMSm X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVlVDa50xhE7KJw6YEY3KLj/3NiHyYLSOaNNquWp2y3CnueSg9EOlIUQPYUOoSQ2tlUQ3NOnORTilisUav/Uw= X-Received: by 2002:a92:6a0b:: with SMTP id f11mr21590629ilc.211.1618208474601; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 23:21:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210326180133.z5qjvtwt7loxvuqt@tomti.i.net-space.pl> <20210326184315.awfdlparysi3hqii@tomti.i.net-space.pl> <5b041746-09e9-0557-9f2a-ac3b37837728@physik.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <5b041746-09e9-0557-9f2a-ac3b37837728@physik.fu-berlin.de> From: Javier Martinez Canillas Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:21:03 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: GRUB error: unknown filesystem on ia64 To: The development of GNU GRUB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: none client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::133; envelope-from=javier@dowhile0.org; helo=mail-il1-x133.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -4 X-Spam_score: -0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 06:21:18 -0000 Hello Adrian, On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 11:41 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > On 4/8/21 7:30 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > On 4/8/21 7:10 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > >>> Any news on this? I assume this should be trivial to fix when considering just the > >> > >> Not yet, sorry. I discussed a little bit with Peter yesterday but it's strange > >> that only affects ia64 and not x64. I'll try to take a look at this next week. > > > > It's probably caused by different natural alignment which causes the code on x86_64 > > to land at the right position automatically. > > OK, so I had another discussion with Michael Karcher who analyzed the bug and the > problem is apparently that after the change, mkimage adds an alignment to the module > address which it did not before the change. > > And the suspicion why this affects ia64 and not x86_64 could be that the module data > is properly aligned as mkimage expects while it's not on ia64. > Interesting, thanks for the input. Could you please share a both GRUB binary that works and one that fails to compare ? Best regards, Javier