From: Jacob Vosmaer <jacob@gitlab.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>, Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ls-refs.c: minimize number of refs visited
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 11:44:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADMWQoMHUwJcR5T8H048BgsLCd8-_yg8d8Dj-ojYV31pUmhw4w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADMWQoOzD0xF4PSAUo2qXp62-tTJX4DhquFZxFjfdQmy+7j+6g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:40 AM Jacob Vosmaer <jacob@gitlab.com> wrote:
> I also think we could. But as I alluded to in my original commit
> message, I don't like how complicated that gets. I find it easier to
> convince myself in the current form that the longest prefix code
> selects _enough_ prefixes, which is a weaker property than "selects
> exactly the right prefixes".
By which I mean to say I think we should keep the current form, with
the final authoritative ref matching pass.
Jacob
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-20 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-19 14:42 [PATCH 0/1] ls-refs.c: minimize number of refs visited Jacob Vosmaer
2021-01-19 14:42 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Jacob Vosmaer
2021-01-19 16:12 ` Taylor Blau
2021-01-19 17:42 ` Jacob Vosmaer
2021-01-19 18:19 ` [PATCH 0/2] ls-refs: only traverse through longest common ref prefix Taylor Blau
2021-01-19 18:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] refs: expose 'for_each_fullref_in_prefixes' Taylor Blau
2021-01-19 18:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] ls-refs.c: traverse longest common ref prefix Taylor Blau
2021-01-19 23:09 ` Jeff King
2021-01-19 23:52 ` Taylor Blau
2021-01-20 0:08 ` Jeff King
2021-01-20 11:00 ` Jacob Vosmaer
2021-01-20 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] ls-refs: traverse prefixes of disjoint "ref-prefix" sets Taylor Blau
2021-01-20 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] refs: expose 'for_each_fullref_in_prefixes' Taylor Blau
2021-01-20 19:56 ` Jeff King
2021-01-20 20:12 ` Taylor Blau
2021-01-23 2:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-25 1:35 ` Taylor Blau
2021-01-20 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ls-refs.c: initialize 'prefixes' before using it Taylor Blau
2021-01-20 19:58 ` Jeff King
2021-01-20 20:13 ` Taylor Blau
2021-01-20 21:50 ` Jacob Vosmaer
2021-01-20 16:04 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ls-refs.c: traverse prefixes of disjoint "ref-prefix" sets Taylor Blau
2021-01-23 17:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] ls-refs: " Junio C Hamano
2021-01-19 19:09 ` [PATCH 1/1] ls-refs.c: minimize number of refs visited Taylor Blau
2021-01-19 21:59 ` Jeff King
2021-01-19 22:15 ` Jeff King
2021-01-19 22:23 ` Taylor Blau
2021-01-19 22:52 ` Jeff King
2021-01-19 22:59 ` Jeff King
2021-01-19 23:02 ` Taylor Blau
2021-01-19 22:53 ` Jeff King
2021-01-19 23:00 ` Taylor Blau
2021-01-19 23:11 ` Jeff King
2021-01-20 10:40 ` Jacob Vosmaer
2021-01-20 10:44 ` Jacob Vosmaer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CADMWQoMHUwJcR5T8H048BgsLCd8-_yg8d8Dj-ojYV31pUmhw4w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jacob@gitlab.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.