From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D44C433FE for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:25:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32852221EC for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:25:07 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 32852221EC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:52830 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkrPm-0005ol-G0 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:25:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37168) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkrFL-0002LN-9a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:14:19 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x642.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::642]:33216) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkrFJ-0002md-4P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:14:18 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-x642.google.com with SMTP id 7so4335717ejm.0 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 08:14:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mF0qSWz+6lBvc9Sq7KVrbzTmDoSEC/HrEwNjsh2nOTQ=; b=gsFbZrcXbRW56QwVacjbEbWTOpijDY+wFYhDi1IUO7nlk2y5UngqBG3+LOg+VP1Mh2 tvbzx2dcMDKzxzOLgHscskZfrTTwhalMpDlpmnHStnPQfPUSwx5ac83iFYWuEJnVK+n3 Gh35wpuE7g1enSL+xw7i6xn/vU9dk2JX1TYxOwx64y59kpGdKWsbm6bHvYCCdkKqOgWI UgTlbqIMQ/aSfHAUlhrjd/ETCdu7R9CwPzXKLqOPATG1hTJX55AANyCPl1DFu6KjuXAH wexkp8LhyGW+m8l1gKGCxNwSKE805wgm3utlYrhWtlSPVMB6AbFEH8JJpwuruRC7yMWY jk8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mF0qSWz+6lBvc9Sq7KVrbzTmDoSEC/HrEwNjsh2nOTQ=; b=UZLxf1LRXaFXtBe3iftKrelUGW4+yuPVkXKU57zf/Y2wKCnLfCjYV6ZQ46GYGwhJZu SKenieigQ1ghXlpUpQUiw4lYmL+QJaesczjPxRTASLDp/hVTAivUJ7wwPdbw0LB7LtNk XczWV7Cq6yJaOSNCi5XSRMaWZW/xLrAozGI9uOpspLPZdqAMGH1r4B6ap0gwDcTefRJe rJDDUH//PTviBd8HAKCfMraf9mhlnQicivYZxaobguVJoAdXR9c+HGIr1XnY2n9QhQzo I2JNZddDNS0BUaTQJ6lWOEw+oPrgTmZQ763sUKZOnsOZ50U+vhEGRK7hJxwFr7GaaSZt HQYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533CXqRFeu3W7+HLDeXU7pxiCuKUWSvlmCGQYMMffG+rDm8NMyQr j82206sVL3pC29vlz8ZLu/Ut8GXkQd2ZIjLDvWvNaw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxmCc8xEXA26L1vjOYE/sX8uT9YTw9UqoFLy+WF+tvOmEVW/uGHNDDcqJrON3+N3JFel++rD9km46QJts/1aZk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4bc6:: with SMTP id x6mr3167295ejv.4.1607012055361; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 08:14:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201125040642.2339476-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org> <56701347-e0a0-ae47-8bba-f5cdff253475@redhat.com> <3d6d46d8-04bc-7ad8-d71e-4ce15a6e7e47@ispras.ru> In-Reply-To: <3d6d46d8-04bc-7ad8-d71e-4ce15a6e7e47@ispras.ru> From: Peter Maydell Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:14:03 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH for-6.0 00/11] target/arm: enforce alignment To: Pavel Dovgalyuk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::642; envelope-from=peter.maydell@linaro.org; helo=mail-ej1-x642.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Richard Henderson , qemu-arm , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu=2DDaud=C3=A9?= , QEMU Developers , Pavel Dovgalyuk Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:10, Pavel Dovgalyuk wr= ote: > > On 03.12.2020 15:30, Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9 wrote: > > Cc'ing Pavel > > > > On 12/1/20 4:55 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 04:06, Richard Henderson > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> As reported in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905356 > >>> > >>> Not implementing SCTLR.A, but all of the other required > >>> alignment for SCTLR.A=3D0 in Table A3-1. > >> > >> Something in this series breaks the 'make check-acceptance' > >> record-and-replay test: > >> > >> (30/40) tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test_aa= rch64_virt: > >> PASS (9.14 s) > >> (31/40) tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test_ar= m_virt: > >> INTERRUPTED: Test interrupted by SIGTERM\nRunner error occurred: > >> Timeout reached\nOriginal status: ERROR\n{'name': > >> '31-tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test_arm_virt= ', > >> 'logdir': '/home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-from-laptop/qemu/build/arm-clang= /tests/result... > >> (90.19 s) > >> > >> The log shows the "recording execution" apparently hanging, > >> with the last output from the guest > >> [ 3.183662] Registering SWP/SWPB emulation handler > > I looked through the patches and it does not seem that they can break > anything. > Could it be the same avocado/chardev socket glitch as in some previous > failures? > What happens when re-running this test? I ran it a couple of times with the patchset and it failed the same way each time. Without is fine. thanks -- PMM