All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Pedersen <thomas@cozybit.com>
To: Simon Wunderlich <simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Antonio Quartulli <antonio@open-mesh.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marek Lindner <marek@open-mesh.com>,
	Mathias Kretschmer <mathias.kretschmer@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] design discussion: Collecting information for (non-peer) stations
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:10:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG6hwVPF_kvqCOtWJTWpLChOGbo+P8Du=y6Js0MDiF19_QR=ag@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130220171955.GA1556@pandem0nium>

Hi Simon,

On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Simon Wunderlich
<simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote:

> To sum from this discussion (I think it's a good idea):
>
>  * embed the stats_entry into the sta_info
>  * update peer-stats by modifying the embedded stats_entry (we do the lookup anyway
>  * keep the non-peer stats in a seperate hash, and only keep stats_entry for them (we don't need
>    the full sta_info after all).
>
> We should consider some corner cases here, e.g. adding stas, then we have to
> copy+remove the stats from the non-peer hash, or removing stas, then we have
> to copy the so-far collected stats to the non-peer hash.
>
> If you are okay with it, we can use the NL80211_CMD_GET_STATION command
> (as in iw station dump), and add a seperate flag to give info for non-peer sta.
>
> What about the other commands I suggested (read+reset, start, stop)? For read+reset,
> we could just send yet another flag (RESET_STATS) with the GET_STATION command, but
> for start/stop we would need new commands? Or would you have any better idea?
>
> @Thomas: Is there anything to consider for 802.11s?

I can't think of anything that would be specifically useful for
802.11s right now, and we can always extend the statistics in the
future. One case where this might be useful is if the driver has a
limited number of station slots, the MPM could monitor neighbor
stations for a more "suitable" peer candidate, but your existing stats
should cover that.

Turning on this feature would add some sort of (internal to mac80211)
monitor interface, or just disable all frame filters on a given PHY?
How does it work now?

-- 
Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-20 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-15 17:19 [RFC] design discussion: Collecting information for (non-peer) stations Simon Wunderlich
2013-02-18 14:30 ` Johannes Berg
2013-02-18 14:33   ` Johannes Berg
2013-02-18 14:46     ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-02-18 15:29       ` Johannes Berg
2013-02-18 15:38         ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-02-18 15:43           ` Johannes Berg
2013-02-18 15:49             ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-02-18 15:58               ` Johannes Berg
2013-02-18 16:07                 ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-02-18 16:51                   ` Johannes Berg
2013-02-18 19:36                     ` Mathias Kretschmer
2013-02-20 17:19                     ` Simon Wunderlich
2013-02-20 19:10                       ` Thomas Pedersen [this message]
2013-02-21 17:19                         ` Simon Wunderlich
2013-02-19  9:32 ` Thomas Hühn
2013-02-20 17:49   ` Simon Wunderlich
2013-02-20 18:04   ` Mathias Kretschmer
2013-02-22 10:07 ` Zefir Kurtisi
2013-02-22 11:43   ` Simon Wunderlich
2013-02-22 12:34     ` Zefir Kurtisi
2013-02-22 16:21 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-02-22 16:36   ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-02-22 17:03     ` Felix Fietkau
2013-02-22 17:42       ` Adrian Chadd
2013-02-25 10:28         ` Simon Wunderlich
2013-03-08 14:13           ` Simon Wunderlich
2013-03-11 12:01             ` Zefir Kurtisi
2013-03-25 14:43               ` Simon Wunderlich
2013-02-22 17:42       ` Thomas Pedersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAG6hwVPF_kvqCOtWJTWpLChOGbo+P8Du=y6Js0MDiF19_QR=ag@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=thomas@cozybit.com \
    --cc=antonio@open-mesh.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marek@open-mesh.com \
    --cc=mathias.kretschmer@fokus.fraunhofer.de \
    --cc=simon.wunderlich@s2003.tu-chemnitz.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.