From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F17BEC433F5 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 16:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1352060AbiBCQHu (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:07:50 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52262 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1349017AbiBCQHt (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:07:49 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 357F3C06173B for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 08:07:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id x23so7116374lfc.0 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 08:07:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kinvolk.io; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=U8C94DRdIZGAroYerjdGjoFnF/GC8q7KFZokkTOxUZs=; b=gDpiugQBFCZYvMpY47vTeHN5scolnvYBOB4bSGLZnNX3gB7Mf/6B1iTEQQ3UCu7D1K jw1x3PlIPKkZ5sv4//YSSWYiMc59xSiVaTDkx8PMqwhfbC292fbKu0dy8NVXPuSOY3jj N5alIlpk1mTLEtAfHFIjo9SS807hGfxRYRFtU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=U8C94DRdIZGAroYerjdGjoFnF/GC8q7KFZokkTOxUZs=; b=SrSUBXOpXQBBupf0b+s7oHXKteXQYAn1fYQG0XRXbWXo/wU+bDWES4IfkngpapeJLy idQIbdY5smwA69kRpYkJfXabbs4klS9k6NoxCbaNQ+ZgIXMfGGeS10S+70L6nKMez5Uw LadHm/xwjMsPk20nObjF8lBZxy/Ado4mU/oZQE3qFMesIvMFYxkV4DULvec5CWVXLv8R eZmOl+df21QeDfjp37uyGcXsDZFRYs9VcThSGKVbGKk09swt9cDbyHpTXu0H+laCLo90 ZcyMyeu4gvds80o0/S8y92RGC3FCOWjjUxSvVnr+DHSJQi52u2oWuAadWFRr/XIAgC1/ hhZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532NBsp+tCEborxTqWyVon5Gsvp6tL26qgWie0nYke426V9Tmd3K slmIj/KoeAi8Z5jkX/YV3Q3zP+vwrfBzvsbXKQDXMA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwWN6XUZynoQwdD2Uk4RznsvF2cwOFpad/pcBwo8RfeX5K/zELXa30kkC2ev6EIldXn8xHa8+DW+ArbBJaqW00= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:2342:: with SMTP id p2mr27218556lfu.382.1643904467469; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 08:07:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220128223312.1253169-1-mauricio@kinvolk.io> <20220128223312.1253169-4-mauricio@kinvolk.io> In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Mauricio_V=C3=A1squez_Bernal?= Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:07:36 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/9] bpftool: Implement btf_save_raw() To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: Networking , bpf , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Quentin Monnet , Rafael David Tinoco , Lorenzo Fontana , Leonardo Di Donato Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org > The logic looks good, but you need to merge adding this static > function with the patch that's using that static function. Otherwise > you will break bisectability because compiler will warn about unused > static function. > It only emits a warning but it compiles fine. Is that still an issue?