From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1E3C4167B for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 01:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B63A230FF for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 01:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390881AbgLKBDV (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:03:21 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33574 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730793AbgLKBCo (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:02:44 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x141.google.com (mail-lf1-x141.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::141]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 050F8C0613CF for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 17:02:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x141.google.com with SMTP id l11so11056925lfg.0 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 17:02:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eL+h7xeFX3PxTC7wOBMQFR0+2THjd1Dky1cIThWDYyQ=; b=h+6i4V+xCVtPhqyQ5W+p+kPGcRM0UqI/VgG0mk0VJ42AvTM1RMPxswzs9OIiYBv5Bk lKzqn0O9h080zfeq9Qj0Bonkh9cLgcEO2VtIDzC1Wwd5kmcRPGDRcJNpmXICTNURnzJW cOHs+SDNcu+K7A6j05UOGU6eXLCbDqnhzn4JI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eL+h7xeFX3PxTC7wOBMQFR0+2THjd1Dky1cIThWDYyQ=; b=Kysjii8rekHwPIrRf7Ga8qthx2ZiwE7rQTYIFymVab57ycPXSiYiqg9eXCK93nRQLz njVTqkXrCKiFp8qdwLwfbMiykmrVAnnh59XagNvIRfvOkTeXzNzbMyiWmi46iVPFDqhr 6aYElkbnxUkRPS8EJSZTd4ox4bYUSIcuLNgK1HUsdW8JeHQCnfJkHwfr5/sKz23LVpsa nm+k+vWnpDE46g8lsoL79/qP+utUlecmX+qFMcm0k9CqnU8bDBL18yH8lHciDK4J8dAH Hu/hDaCtSpHFmMVfdfnL+qsDQAED1sj4papESM+xuVS9W5cbA5gAmtZcYe+FPnGzxPfe KBUg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+zx9trPUCbF8k8YVW780micIIWSF4bCtvFD6/82GYzXsdhAxJ v3pZEJVtfm3dbIjUxL3Q0d41ZiVFI3sjtg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxL+5oWevrX5LXEzEl9tmrZLAG7FnvpnTwJePgctBHU/33LIVUGapbsPXckOVMCMq75igKmRA== X-Received: by 2002:a19:f241:: with SMTP id d1mr3631544lfk.241.1607648522019; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 17:02:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf1-f44.google.com (mail-lf1-f44.google.com. [209.85.167.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b29sm697913lfc.12.2020.12.10.17.02.01 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 17:02:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-f44.google.com with SMTP id m25so10992959lfc.11 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 17:02:01 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a19:8557:: with SMTP id h84mr3448854lfd.201.1607648520738; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 17:02:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201210200114.525026-1-axboe@kernel.dk> <20201210200114.525026-3-axboe@kernel.dk> <20201210222934.GI4170059@dread.disaster.area> <20201211005830.GD3913616@dread.disaster.area> In-Reply-To: <20201211005830.GD3913616@dread.disaster.area> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 17:01:44 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: expose LOOKUP_NONBLOCK through openat2() RESOLVE_NONBLOCK To: Dave Chinner Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-fsdevel , Al Viro Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 4:58 PM Dave Chinner wrote: > > Umm, yes, that is _exactly_ what I just said. :/ .,. but it _sounded_ like you would actually want to do the whole filesystem thing, since why would you have piped up otherwise. I just wanted to clarify that the onle sane model is the one that patch actually implements. Otherwise, your email was just nit-picking about a single word in a comment in a header file. Was that really what you wanted to do? Linus