From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756781AbbE2Pap (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2015 11:30:45 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f53.google.com ([209.85.218.53]:33840 "EHLO mail-oi0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756191AbbE2Pan convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2015 11:30:43 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <9fee05c37be52b8f8fcd5df05f391af9e3d820e8.1429868795.git.agruenba@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 17:30:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v3 37/45] nfs/sunrpc: No more encode and decode function pointer casting From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_Gr=C3=BCnbacher?= To: Trond Myklebust Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux FS-devel Mailing List , Linux NFS Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2015-05-29 2:37 GMT+02:00 Trond Myklebust : > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Andreas Grünbacher > wrote: >> 2015-05-29 1:11 GMT+02:00 Trond Myklebust : >>> How is this even remotely relevant to ACL functionality, and why does >>> it deserve to bypass the NFS tree? >> >> I've posted this to the linux-nfs mailing list for review among >> others, how is that >> bypassing the NFS tree? Would you prefer those things sent to you personally >> as well? > > No. I'm saying that changes that affect the core RPC code should not > be going through external trees as part of an external feature; they > should go through the maintainer trees. I agree, none of that is going to get merged directly. Andreas From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_Gr=C3=BCnbacher?= Subject: Re: [RFC v3 37/45] nfs/sunrpc: No more encode and decode function pointer casting Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 17:30:42 +0200 Message-ID: References: <9fee05c37be52b8f8fcd5df05f391af9e3d820e8.1429868795.git.agruenba@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux FS-devel Mailing List , Linux NFS Mailing List To: Trond Myklebust Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-nfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org 2015-05-29 2:37 GMT+02:00 Trond Myklebust : > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Andreas Gr=C3=BCnbacher > wrote: >> 2015-05-29 1:11 GMT+02:00 Trond Myklebust : >>> How is this even remotely relevant to ACL functionality, and why do= es >>> it deserve to bypass the NFS tree? >> >> I've posted this to the linux-nfs mailing list for review among >> others, how is that >> bypassing the NFS tree? Would you prefer those things sent to you pe= rsonally >> as well? > > No. I'm saying that changes that affect the core RPC code should not > be going through external trees as part of an external feature; they > should go through the maintainer trees. I agree, none of that is going to get merged directly. Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html