From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Use WFE for spinlock and ring
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 10:51:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8zfNNnnGu0OU2y+MPc8-0GZgpsriFeSPh9UkxQGxApPVQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YJUVbrQ1a2V24N0j@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:24 PM Bruce Richardson
<bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > The problem is inconsistency in performance on different Arm platforms.
> > > We had decided that each platform needs to enable it after some testing.
> > >
> > > Then it sounds like it does indeed need to be a build option. Does it need to
> > > be added to the meson_options.txt, or can it just be specified in cross-files
> > > and optionally via c_args?
> >
> > Add it to the meson_options.txt is good as the option will be clearly exposed.
> > My concern is more options (e.g. RTE_ARCH_ARM64_MEMCPY) need to be added in.
> > Will the options bloat meson_options.txt?
>
> That bloat would indeed become a concern. We may need to look at more use
> of auto-detection and cross files for such options.
Ruifeng,
This series is blocked on this last topic.
Do you intend to send a n+1?
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-05 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-24 7:07 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/2] Use WFE for spinlock and ring Gavin Hu
2020-04-24 7:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/2] spinlock: use wfe to reduce contention on aarch64 Gavin Hu
2020-04-24 7:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/2] ring: use wfe to wait for ring tail update " Gavin Hu
2020-04-24 13:23 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-26 8:41 ` Gavin Hu
2020-04-24 14:46 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-04-26 8:33 ` Gavin Hu
2020-04-26 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] Use WFE for spinlock and ring Gavin Hu
2020-05-01 9:47 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-05-03 14:54 ` David Marchand
2020-05-03 21:31 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-09-25 14:30 ` David Marchand
2021-03-25 14:58 ` David Marchand
2021-04-25 6:06 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-25 15:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-26 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] spinlock: use wfe to reduce contention on aarch64 Gavin Hu
2020-04-28 12:22 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-04-26 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] ring: use wfe to wait for ring tail update " Gavin Hu
2021-04-25 5:56 ` [dpdk-dev] Use WFE for spinlock and ring Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-25 5:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] spinlock: use wfe to reduce contention on aarch64 Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-25 5:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] ring: use wfe to wait for ring tail update " Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-26 5:38 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-28 17:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-04-29 14:35 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-29 15:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-05-07 8:25 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-28 7:42 ` [dpdk-dev] Use WFE for spinlock and ring David Marchand
2021-04-28 9:30 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-28 11:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-29 14:28 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-29 15:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-30 9:16 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-04-30 13:41 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-04-30 14:19 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-05-07 10:18 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-05-07 10:24 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-07-05 8:51 ` David Marchand [this message]
2021-07-05 10:21 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07 14:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-07-08 9:41 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-08 16:58 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-07-07 5:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] " Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07 5:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] spinlock: use wfe to reduce contention on aarch64 Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07 5:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] ring: use wfe to wait for ring tail update " Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07 5:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] build: add option to enable wait until equal Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07 12:15 ` David Marchand
2021-07-07 5:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] Use WFE for spinlock and ring Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07 5:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] spinlock: use wfe to reduce contention on aarch64 Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07 5:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] ring: use wfe to wait for ring tail update " Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07 5:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] build: add option to enable wait until equal Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07 6:32 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-07 6:46 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07 12:27 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-07-07 12:36 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-07-08 6:25 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-08 6:32 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-07-08 7:32 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-08 9:21 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-08 10:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-09 18:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] Use WFE for spinlock and ring Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJFAV8zfNNnnGu0OU2y+MPc8-0GZgpsriFeSPh9UkxQGxApPVQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.