From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423358AbbEOAgS (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2015 20:36:18 -0400 Received: from mail-vn0-f45.google.com ([209.85.216.45]:43742 "EHLO mail-vn0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423286AbbEOAgP (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2015 20:36:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1431618016-2087-8-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> References: <1431618016-2087-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1431618016-2087-8-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 09:36:14 +0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: eAogGOxgSR3byQlorNOmd6mjU0U Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable options for Exynos display support From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: arm@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , Kevin Hilman , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Doug Anderson , Kukjin Kim , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2015-05-15 0:40 GMT+09:00 Javier Martinez Canillas : > Many Exynos devices have devices attached to their display ports. > This patch enables the needed Kconfig options to support different > configuration such as simple panel, embedded DisplayPort (eDP) to > LVDS bridges and HDMI displays. Enabling the display would be nice but for some quite long time we had issues with DRM on Exynos. exynos_defconfig has it enabled and most of boards boot fine with it. Exception is Arndale 5250: http://storage.kernelci.org/next/next-20150514/arm-exynos_defconfig/lab-khilman/boot-exynos5250-arndale.html [ 1.630290] [drm:exynos_dp_bind] *ERROR* failed: of_get_videomode() : -22 [ 1.637071] exynos-drm exynos-drm: failed to bind 145b0000.dp-controller (ops exynos_dp_ops): -22 [ 1.646504] exynos-drm exynos-drm: master bind failed: -22 [ 1.651391] exynos-drm: probe of exynos-drm failed with error -22 Anyway it is not like I am against it... just wondering. On the other hand enabling it could help in early detection of errors. Best regards, Krzysztof