From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88EB1C433E6 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:51:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6405E64FC3 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:51:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233424AbhCJQvF (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:51:05 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f49.google.com ([209.85.210.49]:46135 "EHLO mail-ot1-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232481AbhCJQur (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:50:47 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f49.google.com with SMTP id r24so9936754otq.13; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:50:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=R6oolcrYeb0Yyin4lnT3+FTu+4DQx6lMstBt7PUzwi0=; b=q3T5jhpDRW0arpOr+B2pBpKJ+vNombSvom2iHmPDIOzHaAsXgB8hsd8/tkd2ULCeUv 1ST9bqHDeWL6GRqoiEKRHLP8KyQ37mjs6cCBW4BdUwQ2KiC3gqmRWL8E9QQmEzOi8gg/ SdbBBi0B+QG7XDjQluu4MfLBKmV8qC1c3fWZJhKO65sA4je0+gNtZUmfPff8LnCpGAIT vOnNKmdvMTnSJptjZbMGjdnDRXIKWcEnm79/CqOlsxJD9HwEwok/GqAjvRJlfo7+IFOu 7z8qLoBW/IxmgGN8bXu3xcPMy7nCYDj4fO/doBDlinTznFk0V7XRpZcOPRKBpbI3YDwj kH1g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ygL5p/evcAU3aHkoFrMLdV5QrFPOUTh6CONQqca3lxhQWuAiP QPN+r5ks4PO+QhrbuObjkKFdbmZ8M5gWnoi5CLI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxlV/2wigpev0dSrTzB8wJqeftxRW6Co9lMLbSVPFiscoQ+P0Nnu5Je7p/f5rT4/q41GbjFbv0o9/cGohCEUyU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1e03:: with SMTP id s3mr3331388otr.321.1615395047082; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:50:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6660750.UgobAMfxrE@kreacher> <20210310160851.GA331077@ninjato> In-Reply-To: <20210310160851.GA331077@ninjato> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:50:36 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-scmi: Drop unused ACPI_MODULE_NAME definition To: Wolfram Sang Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-i2c , Linux ACPI , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 5:08 PM Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:47:10PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 7:29 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > > > The ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definition is only used by the message > > > printing macros from ACPICA that are not used by the code in > > > question, so it is redundant. Drop it. > > > > > > No functional impact. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > If there are no concerns regarding this, I'll queue it up for 5.13 in > > the ACPI tree, thanks! > > I'd prefer the I2C tree a tad to avoid conflicts. Any reason for the > ACPI tree? There are some patches doing this type of a cleanup in the ACPI tree, but this is the only reason, so please route it through the i2c tree if that is preferred.