All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers core: don't do anything in device_del() when device_add() fail
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 15:31:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0j1-AA2fWmB0Cr=pr6d+qt_J7Vxr=RPnbvVBfqQYY3KuQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210401130138.2164928-1-yuyufen@huawei.com>

On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 2:56 PM Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Recently, our syzbot test reported NULL pointer dereference in
> device_del() by injecting memory allocation fail in device_add().
>
> For now, callers of device_add(), such as add_disk(), may ignore
> device_add()'s fail and go on working. In unregister path, it will
> call device_del() from del_gendisk(). That can cause various NULL
> pointer dereference, including dev->p is NULL in kill_device(),
> 'name' is NULL in sysfs_remove_link(), kobj->sd is 'NULL' when call
> dpm_sysfs_remove(), and so on.
>
> To avoid these kernel panic, we call device_del() only when device_add()
> is success.

The patch looks reasonable to me, but the above is not what it does.

It causes device_del() to be a no-op for devices that have not been
successfully added.

> Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/core.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index f29839382f81..a10ec5dbc577 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -3380,6 +3380,9 @@ void device_del(struct device *dev)
>         struct class_interface *class_intf;
>         unsigned int noio_flag;
>
> +       if (!dev->p)
> +               return;
> +
>         device_lock(dev);
>         kill_device(dev);
>         device_unlock(dev);
> --

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-01 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-01 13:01 [PATCH] drivers core: don't do anything in device_del() when device_add() fail Yufen Yu
2021-04-01 13:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2021-04-02 15:06 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0j1-AA2fWmB0Cr=pr6d+qt_J7Vxr=RPnbvVBfqQYY3KuQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuyufen@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.