All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>
To: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
	Longpeng <longpeng2@huawei.com>,
	Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>,
	Martin Petrus Hubertus Habets <martinh@xilinx.com>,
	Harpreet Singh Anand <hanand@xilinx.com>,
	dinang@xilinx.com, Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>,
	Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	pabloc@xilinx.com, "Dawar, Gautam" <gautam.dawar@amd.com>,
	Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>,
	habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com,
	Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	tanuj.kamde@amd.com, Wu Zongyong <wuzongyong@linux.alibaba.com>,
	martinpo@xilinx.com, Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>,
	ecree.xilinx@gmail.com, Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Zhang Min <zhang.min9@zte.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] vdpa: Add stop operation
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 09:38:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJaqyWfoBXfr1Njb4=ZyrKtR1PAzUS+kzs55CzHff9C1jGDk2w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f68802c-2692-7321-f916-670ee0abfc40@oracle.com>

On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 2:01 AM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/23/2022 4:54 PM, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 5/23/2022 12:20 PM, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 12:13 PM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 5/20/2022 10:23 AM, Eugenio Pérez wrote:
> >>>> This operation is optional: It it's not implemented, backend
> >>>> feature bit
> >>>> will not be exposed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>    include/linux/vdpa.h | 6 ++++++
> >>>>    1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/include/linux/vdpa.h b/include/linux/vdpa.h
> >>>> index 15af802d41c4..ddfebc4e1e01 100644
> >>>> --- a/include/linux/vdpa.h
> >>>> +++ b/include/linux/vdpa.h
> >>>> @@ -215,6 +215,11 @@ struct vdpa_map_file {
> >>>>     * @reset:                  Reset device
> >>>>     *                          @vdev: vdpa device
> >>>>     *                          Returns integer: success (0) or
> >>>> error (< 0)
> >>>> + * @stop:                    Stop or resume the device (optional,
> >>>> but it must
> >>>> + *                           be implemented if require device stop)
> >>>> + *                           @vdev: vdpa device
> >>>> + *                           @stop: stop (true), not stop (false)
> >>>> + *                           Returns integer: success (0) or error
> >>>> (< 0)
> >>> Is this uAPI meant to address all use cases described in the full blown
> >>> _F_STOP virtio spec proposal, such as:
> >>>
> >>> --------------%<--------------
> >>>
> >>> ...... the device MUST finish any in flight
> >>> operations after the driver writes STOP.  Depending on the device, it
> >>> can do it
> >>> in many ways as long as the driver can recover its normal operation
> >>> if it
> >>> resumes the device without the need of resetting it:
> >>>
> >>> - Drain and wait for the completion of all pending requests until a
> >>>     convenient avail descriptor. Ignore any other posterior descriptor.
> >>> - Return a device-specific failure for these descriptors, so the driver
> >>>     can choose to retry or to cancel them.
> >>> - Mark them as done even if they are not, if the kind of device can
> >>>     assume to lose them.
> >>> --------------%<--------------
> >>>
> >> Right, this is totally underspecified in this series.
> >>
> >> I'll expand on it in the next version, but that text proposed to
> >> virtio-comment was complicated and misleading. I find better to get
> >> the previous version description. Would the next description work?
> >>
> >> ```
> >> After the return of ioctl, the device MUST finish any pending
> >> operations like
> >> in flight requests. It must also preserve all the necessary state (the
> >> virtqueue vring base plus the possible device specific states)
> > Hmmm, "possible device specific states" is a bit vague. Does it
> > require the device to save any device internal state that is not
> > defined in the virtio spec - such as any failed in-flight requests to
> > resubmit upon resume?

I'd let that be device-specific. For example, the net simulator
doesn't need to store them, since it cannot stop while processing
buffers. Other net devices can also decide to simply drop or re-submit
tx frames.

I can check for the block simulator if that's possible too. For
hardware vdpa block devices, this should be combined with the future
"get inflight buffers" call for sure.

> > Or you would lean on SVQ to intercept it in
> > depth and save it with some other means? I think network device also
> > has internal state such as flow steering state that needs bookkeeping
> > as well.

Yes, for state set by the control vq a permanent SVQ is used only for
the cvq. For other things like config space vdpa already presents an
emulated one to the guest, so we're safe in that regard.

> Noted that I understand you may introduce additional feature call
> similar to VHOST_USER_GET_INFLIGHT_FD for (failed) in-flight request,
> but since that's is a get interface, I assume the actual state
> preserving should still take place in this STOP call.
>

Right. I'll add all of this to the proposal.

Thanks!

> -Siwei
>
> >
> > A follow-up question is what is the use of the `stop` argument of
> > false, does it require the device to support resume? I seem to recall
> > this is something to abandon in favor of device reset plus setting
> > queue base/addr after. Or it's just a optional feature that may be
> > device specific (if one can do so in simple way).
> >
> > -Siwei
> >
> >>   that is required
> >> for restoring in the future.
> >>
> >> In the future, we will provide features similar to
> >> VHOST_USER_GET_INFLIGHT_FD
> >> so the device can save pending operations.
> >> ```
> >>
> >> Thanks for pointing it out!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> E.g. do I assume correctly all in flight requests are flushed after
> >>> return from this uAPI call? Or some of pending requests may be subject
> >>> to loss or failure? How does the caller/user specify these various
> >>> options (if there are) for device stop?
> >>>
> >>> BTW, it would be nice to add the corresponding support to vdpa_sim_blk
> >>> as well to demo the stop handling. To just show it on vdpa-sim-net IMHO
> >>> is perhaps not so convincing.
> >>>
> >>> -Siwei
> >>>
> >>>>     * @get_config_size: Get the size of the configuration space
> >>>> includes
> >>>>     *                          fields that are conditional on
> >>>> feature bits.
> >>>>     *                          @vdev: vdpa device
> >>>> @@ -316,6 +321,7 @@ struct vdpa_config_ops {
> >>>>        u8 (*get_status)(struct vdpa_device *vdev);
> >>>>        void (*set_status)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u8 status);
> >>>>        int (*reset)(struct vdpa_device *vdev);
> >>>> +     int (*stop)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, bool stop);
> >>>>        size_t (*get_config_size)(struct vdpa_device *vdev);
> >>>>        void (*get_config)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, unsigned int
> >>>> offset,
> >>>>                           void *buf, unsigned int len);
> >
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-24  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-20 17:23 [PATCH 0/4] Implement vdpasim stop operation Eugenio Pérez
2022-05-20 17:23 ` [PATCH 1/4] vdpa: Add " Eugenio Pérez
2022-05-21 10:13   ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-05-21 10:13     ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-05-23 19:20     ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2022-05-23 23:54       ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-05-23 23:54         ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-05-24  0:01         ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-05-24  0:01           ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-05-24  2:45           ` Jason Wang
2022-05-24  2:45             ` Jason Wang
2022-05-24  7:38           ` Eugenio Perez Martin [this message]
2022-05-24  7:09       ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-05-24  7:09         ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-05-24  7:42         ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2022-05-24  7:51           ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-05-24  7:51             ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-05-20 17:23 ` [PATCH 2/4] vhost-vdpa: introduce STOP backend feature bit Eugenio Pérez
2022-05-21 10:24   ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-05-21 10:24     ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-05-23  9:57     ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2022-05-20 17:23 ` [PATCH 3/4] vhost-vdpa: uAPI to stop the device Eugenio Pérez
2022-05-21  5:20   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-21  5:20     ` kernel test robot
2022-05-21  8:36   ` Martin Habets
2022-05-23  8:11     ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2022-05-20 17:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] vdpa_sim: Implement stop vdpa op Eugenio Pérez
2022-05-23  8:27   ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-05-23  8:27     ` Stefano Garzarella
2022-05-23 19:07     ` Eugenio Perez Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJaqyWfoBXfr1Njb4=ZyrKtR1PAzUS+kzs55CzHff9C1jGDk2w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=dinang@xilinx.com \
    --cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
    --cc=elic@nvidia.com \
    --cc=gautam.dawar@amd.com \
    --cc=habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com \
    --cc=hanand@xilinx.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longpeng2@huawei.com \
    --cc=lulu@redhat.com \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=martinh@xilinx.com \
    --cc=martinpo@xilinx.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabloc@xilinx.com \
    --cc=parav@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=tanuj.kamde@amd.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wuzongyong@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=xieyongji@bytedance.com \
    --cc=zhang.min9@zte.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.