From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59468C4332B for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCCA64FC0 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232976AbhCJPkQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:40:16 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.133]:41737 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230341AbhCJPj6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:39:58 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue012 [213.165.67.97]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MD5fd-1lT3Ur2NWL-0096PB; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:39:56 +0100 Received: by mail-ot1-f41.google.com with SMTP id a17so16786190oto.5; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:39:55 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530bizGt1XwmpPpxiZZ/xaGxr585XYhDYH8XY0JzMYFDEJwMPjDc BnmT2xqlS9ZNEKhsfaO6RjjOVwSpazXZgc1Mr28= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyz+OU7gvgIrSIrSop4e8azU44xAIwSKa5HpTc5C9P44C7QC3z/u5GcCJR7jvFrP3vF9cowRntGlUhuRjPALp4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:14c1:: with SMTP id t1mr2985547otq.305.1615390794792; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:39:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210310083327.480837-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> <20210310083840.481615-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> <20210310094527.GA701493@dell> <35c39c81-08e4-24c8-f683-2fa7a7ea71de@redhat.com> <1c06cb74-f0b0-66e5-a594-ed1ee9bc876e@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: <1c06cb74-f0b0-66e5-a594-ed1ee9bc876e@canonical.com> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:39:37 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/5] arm64: socfpga: rename ARCH_STRATIX10 to ARCH_SOCFPGA64 To: Krzysztof Kozlowski List-Id: Cc: Tom Rix , Lee Jones , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Dinh Nguyen , Rob Herring , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Moritz Fischer , Linux ARM , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , DTML , linux-clk , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, Networking , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, arm-soc , SoC Team , Olof Johansson Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:QuxxoViFqMbIcHIb8w99YreoXmfBiRqTKjDeRQuZ1EIzQbW48uR XURGz5Z6bEHJF80Qq2RuH+k6iYym+jvmHAIeZz0dEs+iCs3ej/vSMIL0xqMEqoVyHObfzJV RY8PF/3byan60umtzRs7qQbCONk1+ki2GAEoscvoUmQ3MqiDfAedEDmPeCOrlpYSkdyoZBQ 3rHa4qCq8M1Ke4bWsjj4w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:cKEqFz4Ztjg=:l2G4YYzG6B1M6ffbG3dvjl GdhjcCZD5IyxBesKT1VCIVbdSN4L9nEKpInyckrxnasm4CFwrcwRWlBNXJRemh9SMElZ1jZDs 1dViagxvR0p0I1T2tM8NsFToRrhInuStbkq2kn6ztCtAnxS+0QPRHJTelJ5x31SgoxEx/DuvS o/0ppoi8iwHMeMoTAFq9wHZGbGh9Ukv1B9v+thOa6LROh6jKmaIhW3HScvcOtNVl1Vm2Ws1CH ip9u6Eu0rjH5jRpXVdKAEwoIYErH66LvKlNvb4eC8StFeIXyI5Lon763ic/p1wDm8KemGPoia sDGFLZt8XWgpF+XIXOTmLElQwhjsUFNASQ1iZrVioHcZhq+qs7ErI54yAxOHcEFgpeZXgIk/l 3UsEYXgo+5CyE2NCpKcI5XA+se+Q8DANdZnQhLKLDf3F/3orgLKpxNMXpaaHb Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:06 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 10/03/2021 15:45, Tom Rix wrote: > > On 3/10/21 1:45 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > Many other architectures do not have vendor prefix (TEGRA, EXYNOS, > ZYNQMP etc). I would call it the same as in ARMv7 - ARCH_SOCFPGA - but > the Altera EDAC driver depends on these symbols to be different. > Anyway, I don't mind using something else for the name. I agree the name SOCFPGA is confusing, since it is really a class of device that is made by multiple manufacturers rather than a brand name, but renaming that now would be equally confusing. If the Intel folks could suggest a better name that describes all products in the platform and is less ambiguous, we could rename it to that. I think ARCH_ALTERA would make sense, but I don't know if that is a name that is getting phased out. (We once renamed the Marvell Orion platform to ARCH_MVEBU, but shortly afterwards, Marvell renamed their embedded business unit (EBU) and the name has no longer made sense since). Regardless of what name we end up with, I do think we should have the same name for 32-bit and 64-bit and instead fix the edac driver to do runtime detection based on the compatible string. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1727C433DB for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) id A2EDA64FBD; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BD3664FA1; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:39:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7BD3664FA1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=arnd@arndb.de Received: from mail-ot1-f43.google.com ([209.85.210.43]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue011 [213.165.67.97]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MQ6C0-1l6lNk2j2m-00M2nk; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:39:56 +0100 Received: by mail-ot1-f43.google.com with SMTP id x28so2015398otr.6; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:39:55 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5335OrNR1Txfz8eJ5EYjMoNz3h/NTd+bkZ/sRcSf7/udCTnGJNBt KcYb3P1slms6Uu+abGmEkE8cFCrdtGutaflyeug= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyz+OU7gvgIrSIrSop4e8azU44xAIwSKa5HpTc5C9P44C7QC3z/u5GcCJR7jvFrP3vF9cowRntGlUhuRjPALp4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:14c1:: with SMTP id t1mr2985547otq.305.1615390794792; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:39:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210310083327.480837-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> <20210310083840.481615-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> <20210310094527.GA701493@dell> <35c39c81-08e4-24c8-f683-2fa7a7ea71de@redhat.com> <1c06cb74-f0b0-66e5-a594-ed1ee9bc876e@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: <1c06cb74-f0b0-66e5-a594-ed1ee9bc876e@canonical.com> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:39:37 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/5] arm64: socfpga: rename ARCH_STRATIX10 to ARCH_SOCFPGA64 To: Krzysztof Kozlowski List-Id: Cc: Tom Rix , Lee Jones , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Dinh Nguyen , Rob Herring , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Moritz Fischer , Linux ARM , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , DTML , linux-clk , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, Networking , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, arm-soc , SoC Team , Olof Johansson Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:vkKLLKt6Bzdzqy8q7HuwbIPAORYzML/tOhoNrsUvDDV7eWXBQp3 VRw9zbA5X0NrlNWzEnDxrDtpnyuW6Tkd8hQpgRKuhVe3THc6TZglmxeSmruUfH7MC8MxI+b cNcf6ay7yUKn9o008eBRLU62V+mbeHjjD+/3FeQqCKWBo9McpLEebYNKjfGY8ZCySCWlSvL akUz+sGA3ldLfOZ5r5Tsw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:bXwE1tsuE60=:TwybvquKwcCO02DHBJNaXB T+eFNIZrvQfBFr7izPY9YaOka11bYXs3999tGG1d3OKTqcVu9qi7hYrazgu+toHBjIoyBJtCA 7T/jiQxyJFAuz54aSHcL3F6JSDLmEZlX3Or+Vw/W6i9VZ+bS0M/wrWPuGgVqbkpllSTcxHmOi UTRFiJt+jGEfioGUiEV9VYV1qvKH8TFdYnBBXjCjJnWLjztqoxUovSk9xSxJAvo3476deDfF9 mh3hzlBaRxpaJl2lisGRG56U5sCofxr0B4RYTsf+1jMzDaGeAtrKFV1l1O+izwUZxhzPN+AwA gQUTROKpC5wvDw4iR7O4WS2UppyaJ/XYtOfsM/qRxWUMkqQlsIaVQVNE9kl4imylPDP1i1bnS RK82pnjpOufAaIPG3KurhyBqVXsA1h9xj5vI2kxXsxUQcrcxV6lcq/rDHm4PR On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:06 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 10/03/2021 15:45, Tom Rix wrote: > > On 3/10/21 1:45 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > Many other architectures do not have vendor prefix (TEGRA, EXYNOS, > ZYNQMP etc). I would call it the same as in ARMv7 - ARCH_SOCFPGA - but > the Altera EDAC driver depends on these symbols to be different. > Anyway, I don't mind using something else for the name. I agree the name SOCFPGA is confusing, since it is really a class of device that is made by multiple manufacturers rather than a brand name, but renaming that now would be equally confusing. If the Intel folks could suggest a better name that describes all products in the platform and is less ambiguous, we could rename it to that. I think ARCH_ALTERA would make sense, but I don't know if that is a name that is getting phased out. (We once renamed the Marvell Orion platform to ARCH_MVEBU, but shortly afterwards, Marvell renamed their embedded business unit (EBU) and the name has no longer made sense since). Regardless of what name we end up with, I do think we should have the same name for 32-bit and 64-bit and instead fix the edac driver to do runtime detection based on the compatible string. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69374C433DB for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:41:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0878864FB9 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:41:27 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0878864FB9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arndb.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=HQukK0H4uq1zMxbP/UoVK7fw/AUITxROPmJ8pYmwU/c=; b=JWkOyp4gGJ27zKxwv7No1zi1k 3dS3SudY00J/zmuRIsMxU1N8hhi+liBIKTfOx+JvikfBatoBs981cqYh7PzNkoeqZCHMu3HuNkZNp /uf/La0RUyJzTLZ7YL368qRafJ/E2GgleKtmDLVxyeMAeNOAU8GZGZjKPnghLE2RE1GOhGFl+nT3Q RxvjvtLPelnD+FKlSY7p2GMDlZPm3sfwY/Ssyngbl2L4MhdjGFDDqYYLzNu+3Xekd6UvnVRJuR4At Vnp+s2wBQUZUPLwoN+yxaqtsw6YjT1IkBGxda6fTdPnbkOEa7f16hdnjW18XPMGj6FZ3Y5uXGrVlr 9kXlhT+fQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lK0wN-0078Zz-El; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:40:03 +0000 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.134]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lK0wI-0078ZK-GV for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:40:00 +0000 Received: from mail-ot1-f48.google.com ([209.85.210.48]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue012 [213.165.67.97]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MYcy3-1lGMAh12EF-00VhcC for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:39:56 +0100 Received: by mail-ot1-f48.google.com with SMTP id f8so11721990otp.8 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:39:55 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531phZbb9AymyxyobhwlLGODyEwTXzLA8FYVUTdBg14adsAlLams 057sev1p7mImfTZ0h/ZlvdQxaazNY7+VgIsxVUk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyz+OU7gvgIrSIrSop4e8azU44xAIwSKa5HpTc5C9P44C7QC3z/u5GcCJR7jvFrP3vF9cowRntGlUhuRjPALp4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:14c1:: with SMTP id t1mr2985547otq.305.1615390794792; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:39:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210310083327.480837-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> <20210310083840.481615-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> <20210310094527.GA701493@dell> <35c39c81-08e4-24c8-f683-2fa7a7ea71de@redhat.com> <1c06cb74-f0b0-66e5-a594-ed1ee9bc876e@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: <1c06cb74-f0b0-66e5-a594-ed1ee9bc876e@canonical.com> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:39:37 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/5] arm64: socfpga: rename ARCH_STRATIX10 to ARCH_SOCFPGA64 To: Krzysztof Kozlowski List-Id: Cc: Tom Rix , Lee Jones , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Dinh Nguyen , Rob Herring , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Moritz Fischer , Linux ARM , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , DTML , linux-clk , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, Networking , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, arm-soc , SoC Team , Olof Johansson X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:uyU4B/53L6dBt9CzUeCrsB+FbCZ/yDqqaTcLFCtz039L76EV8NV 5z2oG994B01K95/VO+TtB8gtR8mhFtlAR0AxQs4Cb9ri0wd5w1ySv9V5MMDPdyPZQe8uvas 7S0LiY1O7dfFcN1XeBgrRRIvNSSeCyWcgc5igl+td/vlptBvg9uEW8oIGMJTxd5svTwkP0Z HuWE/RR9FknRbiAjGEZAw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:/6/1A957YtU=:c2I9K3hfL+VTeFXAN6Wq6J DXgBNjbc2sCPXsiTLfG+iO5GnbUgIL8LJFMudzyh+47xC7U5smEqirTGNu8jtzwmbGaqMhaA+ vGJUQR/kHk3owNOOhwSwgBN1T6RDye+AYJSCcAGNKFdJZSR5kIIgRSJGtaCwTSrYPIjq8RZIx zUANgMHUl8Tmx3yXYg3jjyVR5r1zGPyb2DaZFi96UBSf7Z5xu15MeYVl2s3jAbCjDRNC/oYbx YMikrIlnbNjdTOsMzppOOHcCVcu6Igu8/1Ebz9rFM1AbcjdyBwi4RuSDHZolAzysVPTU64wVN m1N5cHSz7xJEoCeSonUfnjUwqowEysUhnFrpcgiuBXWMu9vR0VqdYLUewbGN6ahvfM+9/jGEp TCN3YzqLBeU/estVgyP1qdiFghVSQgQ+A4+bP/ro938KFniS/1EwLj5+bvxi4FGu7yShw3A9X 2JPUUd/H6o7UCnCHCzFt6uN2MMbBS0upVNPFQwjyv1s897eMQEX3XYDBGhirRJ2INgfm5kN4d 7J0UWfZ/vZPvrhlpSLWiqkzQYo376SYSjtNTMfZlyOJ X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210310_153958_642832_FC243A50 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.61 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: <20210310153937.jrT1zfTjYoMGJz_hOt8KxORFAvB-T5Z7_mb-P28LUG4@z> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:06 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 10/03/2021 15:45, Tom Rix wrote: > > On 3/10/21 1:45 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > Many other architectures do not have vendor prefix (TEGRA, EXYNOS, > ZYNQMP etc). I would call it the same as in ARMv7 - ARCH_SOCFPGA - but > the Altera EDAC driver depends on these symbols to be different. > Anyway, I don't mind using something else for the name. I agree the name SOCFPGA is confusing, since it is really a class of device that is made by multiple manufacturers rather than a brand name, but renaming that now would be equally confusing. If the Intel folks could suggest a better name that describes all products in the platform and is less ambiguous, we could rename it to that. I think ARCH_ALTERA would make sense, but I don't know if that is a name that is getting phased out. (We once renamed the Marvell Orion platform to ARCH_MVEBU, but shortly afterwards, Marvell renamed their embedded business unit (EBU) and the name has no longer made sense since). Regardless of what name we end up with, I do think we should have the same name for 32-bit and 64-bit and instead fix the edac driver to do runtime detection based on the compatible string. Arnd _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel