All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: scrub: per-device bandwidth control
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 15:26:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVFAc66m=eSWhd3Vzk4J_YH8UF6Qe+M2C=PRZ1StYMg_w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a3_O5CdbUqvJsnTh5p0RbSCsXyFhkO6afaLsnwf176Kiw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Arnd,

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 3:15 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 9:43 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 May 2021, David Sterba wrote:
> > > --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> > > +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> > > @@ -1988,6 +1993,60 @@ static void scrub_page_put(struct scrub_page *spage)
> > >       }
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * Throttling of IO submission, bandwidth-limit based, the timeslice is 1
> > > + * second.  Limit can be set via /sys/fs/UUID/devinfo/devid/scrub_speed_max.
> > > + */
> > > +static void scrub_throttle(struct scrub_ctx *sctx)
> > > +{
> > > +     const int time_slice = 1000;
> > > +     struct scrub_bio *sbio;
> > > +     struct btrfs_device *device;
> > > +     s64 delta;
> > > +     ktime_t now;
> > > +     u32 div;
> > > +     u64 bwlimit;
> > > +
> > > +     sbio = sctx->bios[sctx->curr];
> > > +     device = sbio->dev;
> > > +     bwlimit = READ_ONCE(device->scrub_speed_max);
> > > +     if (bwlimit == 0)
> > > +             return;
> > > +
> > > +     /*
> > > +      * Slice is divided into intervals when the IO is submitted, adjust by
> > > +      * bwlimit and maximum of 64 intervals.
> > > +      */
> > > +     div = max_t(u32, 1, (u32)(bwlimit / (16 * 1024 * 1024)));
> > > +     div = min_t(u32, 64, div);
> > > +
> > > +     /* Start new epoch, set deadline */
> > > +     now = ktime_get();
> > > +     if (sctx->throttle_deadline == 0) {
> > > +             sctx->throttle_deadline = ktime_add_ms(now, time_slice / div);
> >
> > ERROR: modpost: "__udivdi3" [fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko] undefined!
> >
> > div_u64(bwlimit, div)
>
> If 'time_slice' is in nanoseconds, the best interface to use
> is ktime_divns().

Actually this one is not a problem...

>
> > > +             sctx->throttle_sent = 0;
> > > +     }
> > > +
> > > +     /* Still in the time to send? */
> > > +     if (ktime_before(now, sctx->throttle_deadline)) {
> > > +             /* If current bio is within the limit, send it */
> > > +             sctx->throttle_sent += sbio->bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
> > > +             if (sctx->throttle_sent <= bwlimit / div)
> > > +                     return;
>
> Doesn't this also need to be changed?

... but this is.

Sorry. I added the annotation to the wrong line, after devising which
code caused the issue from looking at the generated assembly ;-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-20 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-18 14:49 [PATCH] btrfs: scrub: per-device bandwidth control David Sterba
2021-05-18 16:52 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2021-05-18 20:46   ` David Sterba
2021-05-18 20:15 ` waxhead
2021-05-18 21:06   ` David Sterba
2021-05-19  6:53 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-05-19 14:26   ` David Sterba
2021-05-19 15:32     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-05-19 16:20       ` Graham Cobb
2021-05-20 12:41         ` David Sterba
2021-05-21  7:18         ` Zygo Blaxell
2021-05-21  9:55           ` Graham Cobb
2021-05-20 12:28       ` David Sterba
2021-05-20  7:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-05-20 12:55   ` David Sterba
2021-05-20 13:04     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-05-20 13:14   ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-20 13:26     ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2021-05-21 15:16     ` David Sterba
2021-05-21 15:38       ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMuHMdVFAc66m=eSWhd3Vzk4J_YH8UF6Qe+M2C=PRZ1StYMg_w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.