All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	gzhqyz@gmail.com, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: sd: Revert "Rework asynchronous resume support"
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 08:41:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW0WzgQjR33hz9om7ahE5StbDCLozVnZzYAS1WEzStR0w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ecf878dc-905b-f714-4c44-6c90e81f8391@acm.org>

Hi Bart,

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 4:52 AM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> wrote:
> On 8/21/22 02:16, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > It looks like there is a (different) regression in v6.1-rc1 related
> > to s2idle and s2ram, which is not fixed by this patch.  In fact it
> > also happens on boards where SATA is not used, it is just less likely
> > to happen on the non-SATA boards.
> > I still have to bisect it, which may take some time, as the issue is
> > not 100% reproducible.
>
> What kind of regression are you encountering? A crash, a hang or
> something else? Are any call traces available?

A lock-up (magic sysrq does not work) during s2idle.
I tried bisecting it yesterday, but failed.
On v6.0-rc1 (and rc2) it happens ca. 25% of the time, but the closer
I get to v5.19, the less likely it is to happen. Apparently 100
successful s2idle cycles was not enough to declare a kernel good...

    Freezing ...
    Filesystems sync: 0.001 seconds
    Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.001 seconds) done.
    OOM killer disabled.
    Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.001 seconds) done.
    sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache
    sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Stopping disk

---> hangs here if it happens

    ravb e6800000.ethernet eth0: Link is Down
    sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Starting disk
    Micrel KSZ9031 Gigabit PHY e6800000.ethernet-ffffffff:00: attached
PHY driver (mii_bus:phy_addr=e6800000.ethernet-ffffffff:00, irq=186)
    ata1: link resume succeeded after 1 retries
    ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
    ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
    OOM killer enabled.
    Restarting tasks ... done.
    random: crng reseeded on system resumption
    PM: suspend exit
    ravb e6800000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control off

> I posted another revert earlier today but that revert is for code paths
> not related to suspend/resume functionality. See also
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20220821220502.13685-1-bvanassche@acm.org/

Unlikely to be the case, but I'll give it a try later...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-23  6:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-16 17:26 [PATCH] scsi: sd: Revert "Rework asynchronous resume support" Bart Van Assche
2022-08-16 18:00 ` John Garry
2022-08-16 18:06   ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-17  8:20     ` John Garry
2022-08-17 20:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-22 20:53   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-20 15:37 ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-21  9:16   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-08-22  2:52     ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-23  6:41       ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2022-08-23 18:10         ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-26  7:54           ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMuHMdW0WzgQjR33hz9om7ahE5StbDCLozVnZzYAS1WEzStR0w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=gzhqyz@gmail.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.