From: Matthew Weber <matthew.weber@rockwellcollins.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 02/13] security hardening: add RELFO, FORTIFY options
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:05:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANQCQpZCkSXDtXBEoo8XKdfA9384cwK1UheURZ5jq9y5adbr6Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJtjsKb1+dDbkhYw5ZHoTzRSpRfxxygATWoHpjLQ=1ngZWG0fQ@mail.gmail.com>
Johan,
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Johan Oudinet <johan.oudinet@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
[snip]
>
> I don't think -fstack-protector* flags belongs to the preprocessor flags.
> Why did you move them from CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS? Your commit message
> suggests this was an proposition from Arnout but I can't find his
> email where he says that.
>
There's a new patchset proposed this week which should resolve this.
I also noticed a couple other half/full RELO issues too after things
were merged, my testing on that original set missed some cases.
Pending patches(I've tested these and they look good for my test case)
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/list/?series=40826
Matt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-27 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-24 4:09 [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 01/13] stack protector: moved option out of adv menu Matt Weber
2018-01-24 4:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 02/13] security hardening: add RELFO, FORTIFY options Matt Weber
2018-01-28 14:20 ` Peter Korsgaard
2018-02-04 21:56 ` Matthew Weber
2018-04-26 15:55 ` Johan Oudinet
2018-04-27 13:05 ` Matthew Weber [this message]
2018-05-02 13:10 ` Matthew Weber
2018-01-24 4:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 03/13] valgrind: correct linker flag seq Matt Weber
2018-01-24 4:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 04/13] ncurses: " Matt Weber
2018-01-24 4:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 05/13] boost: " Matt Weber
2018-01-24 4:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 06/13] busybox: patch to remove -pie from LDFLAGS Matt Weber
2018-01-24 4:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 07/13] libpcap: correct linker flag seq Matt Weber
2018-01-24 4:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 08/13] iptables: " Matt Weber
2018-01-24 4:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 09/13] zlib: correct linker flag sequence Matt Weber
2018-01-24 4:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 10/13] ustr: " Matt Weber
2018-01-24 4:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 11/13] tcl: " Matt Weber
2018-01-24 4:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 12/13] readline: " Matt Weber
2018-01-24 4:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 13/13] libcap: corrected " Matt Weber
2018-01-28 14:17 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 01/13] stack protector: moved option out of adv menu Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANQCQpZCkSXDtXBEoo8XKdfA9384cwK1UheURZ5jq9y5adbr6Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=matthew.weber@rockwellcollins.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.