On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 1:39 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 09:09:04AM +0200, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 1:50 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >     On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 11:29:50AM +0200, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
> >     > On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 10:58 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >     > > On 2019/12/26 下午12:36, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
> >     > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1708480
> >     > > > Fix leak of region reference that prevents complete
> >     > > > device deletion on hot unplug.
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >     > > More information is needed here, the bug said only q35 can meet
> this
> >     > > issue. What makes q35 different here?
> >     > >
> >     >
> >     > I do not have any ready answer, I did not dig into it too much.
> >     > Probably Michael Tsirkin or Paolo Bonzini can answer without
> digging.
> >
> >
> >
> >     > >
> >     > > >
> >     > > > Signed-off-by: Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@daynix.com>
> >     > > > ---
> >     > > >   hw/virtio/virtio.c | 5 +++++
> >     > > >   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >     > > >
> >     > > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> >     > > > index 04716b5f6c..baadec8abc 100644
> >     > > > --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> >     > > > +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> >     > > > @@ -2340,6 +2340,11 @@ void virtio_del_queue(VirtIODevice
> *vdev, int
> >     n)
> >     > > >       vdev->vq[n].vring.num_default = 0;
> >     > > >       vdev->vq[n].handle_output = NULL;
> >     > > >       vdev->vq[n].handle_aio_output = NULL;
> >     > > > +    /*
> >     > > > +     * with vring.num = 0 the queue will be ignored
> >     > > > +     * in later loops of region cache reset
> >     > > > +     */
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >     > > I can't get the meaning of this comment.
> >     > >
> >     > > Thanks
> >     > >
> >     > >
> >     > > > +    virtio_virtqueue_reset_region_cache(&vdev->vq[n]);
> >
> >
> >     Do we need to drop this from virtio_device_free_virtqueues then?
> >
> >
> >
> > Not mandatory. Repetitive  virtio_virtqueue_reset_region_cache does not
> do
> > anything bad.
> > Some of virtio devices do not do 'virtio_del_queue' at all. Currently
> > virtio_device_free_virtqueues resets region cache for them.
> > IMO, not calling 'virtio_del_queue' is a bug, but not in the scope of
> current
> > series, I'll take care of that later.
>
> Maybe we should just del all queues in virtio_device_unrealize?
> Will allow us to drop some logic tracking which vqs were created.
>
>
Yes, this is also possible with some rework of
virtio_device_free_virtqueues.
virtio-net has some additional operations around queue deletion, it deletes
queues when switches from single queue to multiple.


>
> >
> >     > > >       g_free(vdev->vq[n].used_elems);
> >     > > >   }
> >     > > >
> >     > >
> >
> >
>
>