From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: viresh.linux@gmail.com (viresh kumar)
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:10:48 +0530
Subject: announcing the clk-next branch
In-Reply-To: <201204301637.12536.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>
References: <CAJOA=zOGSh3et4nxE=JdojL4uDjgt8o+oiOU4pmbM=oU2U6prA@mail.gmail.com>
 <201204301441.39191.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>
 <CAOh2x==aTftkv-2agaU873sp5LZhBjLmwYuW9QJm3Rvt+fZ3gw@mail.gmail.com>
 <201204301637.12536.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <CAOh2x=nofJBcpD+EgGDgx1waHsnULxgkHvm=9dEe8J5Et9iLqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Arnd Bergmann
<arnd.bergmann@linaro.org> wrote:
> Looks good to at first sight.

Ahh!! Great.

> So the plan is that both of these
> go through arm-soc and any other patches that might be required for
> the pinctrl or clk tree will be based on these?

Ya. So, it would be great if this can be applied ASAP, as Sascha would also
require, few patches from clk-branch.

--
viresh