All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com>, Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>,
	John Spray <jspray@redhat.com>,
	Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] libceph: add an epoch_barrier field to struct ceph_osd_client
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 17:00:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOi1vP-ReH9vVktm=ZhegLouhrxV0qYy=mgt6tYGhUZ=p11i=g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170330180707.11137-4-jlayton@redhat.com>

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> wrote:
> Cephfs can get cap update requests that contain a new epoch barrier in
> them. When that happens we want to pause all OSD traffic until the right
> map epoch arrives.
>
> Add an epoch_barrier field to ceph_osd_client that is protected by the
> osdc->lock rwsem. When the barrier is set, and the current OSD map
> epoch is below that, pause the request target when submitting the
> request or when revisiting it. Add a way for upper layers (cephfs)
> to update the epoch_barrier as well.
>
> If we get a new map, compare the new epoch against the barrier before
> kicking requests and request another map if the map epoch is still lower
> than the one we want.
>
> If we get a map with a full pool, or at quota condition, then set the
> barrier to the current epoch value.
>
> Reviewed-by: "Yan, Zheng” <zyan@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h |  2 ++
>  net/ceph/debugfs.c              |  3 ++-
>  net/ceph/osd_client.c           | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h b/include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h
> index 8cf644197b1a..85650b415e73 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h
> @@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ struct ceph_osd_client {
>         struct rb_root         osds;          /* osds */
>         struct list_head       osd_lru;       /* idle osds */
>         spinlock_t             osd_lru_lock;
> +       u32                    epoch_barrier;
>         struct ceph_osd        homeless_osd;
>         atomic64_t             last_tid;      /* tid of last request */
>         u64                    last_linger_id;
> @@ -305,6 +306,7 @@ extern void ceph_osdc_handle_reply(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc,
>                                    struct ceph_msg *msg);
>  extern void ceph_osdc_handle_map(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc,
>                                  struct ceph_msg *msg);
> +void ceph_osdc_update_epoch_barrier(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc, u32 eb);
>
>  extern void osd_req_op_init(struct ceph_osd_request *osd_req,
>                             unsigned int which, u16 opcode, u32 flags);
> diff --git a/net/ceph/debugfs.c b/net/ceph/debugfs.c
> index d7e63a4f5578..71ba13927b3d 100644
> --- a/net/ceph/debugfs.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/debugfs.c
> @@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ static int osdmap_show(struct seq_file *s, void *p)
>                 return 0;
>
>         down_read(&osdc->lock);
> -       seq_printf(s, "epoch %d flags 0x%x\n", map->epoch, map->flags);
> +       seq_printf(s, "epoch %u barrier %u flags 0x%x\n", map->epoch,
> +                       osdc->epoch_barrier, map->flags);
>
>         for (n = rb_first(&map->pg_pools); n; n = rb_next(n)) {
>                 struct ceph_pg_pool_info *pi =
> diff --git a/net/ceph/osd_client.c b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
> index 4e56cd1ec265..3a94e8a1c7ff 100644
> --- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
> @@ -1298,8 +1298,9 @@ static bool target_should_be_paused(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc,
>                        __pool_full(pi);
>
>         WARN_ON(pi->id != t->base_oloc.pool);
> -       return (t->flags & CEPH_OSD_FLAG_READ && pauserd) ||
> -              (t->flags & CEPH_OSD_FLAG_WRITE && pausewr);
> +       return ((t->flags & CEPH_OSD_FLAG_READ) && pauserd) ||
> +              ((t->flags & CEPH_OSD_FLAG_WRITE) && pausewr) ||
> +              (osdc->osdmap->epoch < osdc->epoch_barrier);
>  }
>
>  enum calc_target_result {
> @@ -1609,13 +1610,15 @@ static void send_request(struct ceph_osd_request *req)
>  static void maybe_request_map(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc)
>  {
>         bool continuous = false;
> +       u32 epoch = osdc->osdmap->epoch;
>
>         verify_osdc_locked(osdc);
> -       WARN_ON(!osdc->osdmap->epoch);
> +       WARN_ON_ONCE(epoch == 0);
>
>         if (ceph_osdmap_flag(osdc, CEPH_OSDMAP_FULL) ||
>             ceph_osdmap_flag(osdc, CEPH_OSDMAP_PAUSERD) ||
> -           ceph_osdmap_flag(osdc, CEPH_OSDMAP_PAUSEWR)) {
> +           ceph_osdmap_flag(osdc, CEPH_OSDMAP_PAUSEWR) ||
> +           epoch < osdc->epoch_barrier) {
>                 dout("%s osdc %p continuous\n", __func__, osdc);
>                 continuous = true;
>         } else {

Looks like this hunk is smaller now, but I thought we agreed to drop it
entirely?  "epoch < osdc->epoch_barrier" isn't there in Objecter.

> @@ -1653,8 +1656,13 @@ static void __submit_request(struct ceph_osd_request *req, bool wrlocked)
>                 goto promote;
>         }
>
> -       if ((req->r_flags & CEPH_OSD_FLAG_WRITE) &&
> -           ceph_osdmap_flag(osdc, CEPH_OSDMAP_PAUSEWR)) {
> +       if (osdc->osdmap->epoch < osdc->epoch_barrier) {
> +               dout("req %p epoch %u barrier %u\n", req, osdc->osdmap->epoch,
> +                    osdc->epoch_barrier);
> +               req->r_t.paused = true;
> +               maybe_request_map(osdc);
> +       } else if ((req->r_flags & CEPH_OSD_FLAG_WRITE) &&
> +                  ceph_osdmap_flag(osdc, CEPH_OSDMAP_PAUSEWR)) {
>                 dout("req %p pausewr\n", req);
>                 req->r_t.paused = true;
>                 maybe_request_map(osdc);
> @@ -1808,7 +1816,8 @@ static void abort_request(struct ceph_osd_request *req, int err)
>
>  /*
>   * Drop all pending requests that are stalled waiting on a full condition to
> - * clear, and complete them with ENOSPC as the return code.
> + * clear, and complete them with ENOSPC as the return code. Set the
> + * osdc->epoch_barrier to the latest replay version epoch that was aborted.

This comment needs an update -- replay version is gone...

>   */
>  static void ceph_osdc_abort_on_full(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc)
>  {
> @@ -1836,8 +1845,10 @@ static void ceph_osdc_abort_on_full(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc)
>                                 abort_request(req, -ENOSPC);
>                 }
>         }
> +       /* Update the epoch barrier to current epoch */
> +       osdc->epoch_barrier = osdc->osdmap->epoch;

How important is it to update the epoch barrier only if something was
aborted?  Being here doesn't mean that something was actually aborted.

>  out:
> -       dout("return abort_on_full\n");
> +       dout("return abort_on_full barrier=%u\n", osdc->epoch_barrier);
>  }
>
>  static void check_pool_dne(struct ceph_osd_request *req)
> @@ -3293,7 +3304,8 @@ void ceph_osdc_handle_map(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc, struct ceph_msg *msg)
>         pausewr = ceph_osdmap_flag(osdc, CEPH_OSDMAP_PAUSEWR) ||
>                   ceph_osdmap_flag(osdc, CEPH_OSDMAP_FULL) ||
>                   have_pool_full(osdc);
> -       if (was_pauserd || was_pausewr || pauserd || pausewr)
> +       if (was_pauserd || was_pausewr || pauserd || pausewr ||
> +           osdc->osdmap->epoch < osdc->epoch_barrier)
>                 maybe_request_map(osdc);
>
>         kick_requests(osdc, &need_resend, &need_resend_linger);
> @@ -3311,6 +3323,24 @@ void ceph_osdc_handle_map(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc, struct ceph_msg *msg)
>         up_write(&osdc->lock);
>  }
>
> +void ceph_osdc_update_epoch_barrier(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc, u32 eb)
> +{
> +       down_read(&osdc->lock);
> +       if (unlikely(eb > osdc->epoch_barrier)) {
> +               up_read(&osdc->lock);
> +               down_write(&osdc->lock);
> +               if (osdc->epoch_barrier < eb) {

Nit: make it "eb > osdc->epoch_barrier" so it matches the unlikely
condition.

Thanks,

                Ilya

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-04 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-30 18:05 [PATCH v6 0/7] implement -ENOSPC handling in cephfs Jeff Layton
2017-03-30 18:07 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] libceph: remove req->r_replay_version Jeff Layton
2017-03-30 18:07   ` [PATCH v6 2/7] libceph: allow requests to return immediately on full conditions if caller wishes Jeff Layton
2017-04-04 14:55     ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-03-30 18:07   ` [PATCH v6 3/7] libceph: abort already submitted but abortable requests when map or pool goes full Jeff Layton
2017-04-04 14:57     ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-03-30 18:07   ` [PATCH v6 4/7] libceph: add an epoch_barrier field to struct ceph_osd_client Jeff Layton
2017-04-04 15:00     ` Ilya Dryomov [this message]
2017-04-04 16:34       ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-04 19:47         ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-04-04 21:12           ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-05  9:22             ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-04-05 13:29               ` Jeff Layton
2017-04-06  9:17                 ` Ilya Dryomov
2017-03-30 18:07   ` [PATCH v6 5/7] ceph: handle epoch barriers in cap messages Jeff Layton
2017-03-30 18:07   ` [PATCH v6 6/7] Revert "ceph: SetPageError() for writeback pages if writepages fails" Jeff Layton
2017-03-30 18:07   ` [PATCH v6 7/7] ceph: when seeing write errors on an inode, switch to sync writes Jeff Layton
2017-04-04 14:55   ` [PATCH v6 1/7] libceph: remove req->r_replay_version Ilya Dryomov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOi1vP-ReH9vVktm=ZhegLouhrxV0qYy=mgt6tYGhUZ=p11i=g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=jspray@redhat.com \
    --cc=sage@redhat.com \
    --cc=zyan@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.