From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jianbo Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] net/i40e: configurable PTYPE mapping Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 13:45:51 +0800 Message-ID: References: <20170404015516.7784-1-qi.z.zhang@intel.com> <7f5ba680-9b10-dde5-fef2-5b245f928c93@intel.com> <8195227.QCEXF4XZSi@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Qi Zhang , dev@dpdk.org, Ferruh Yigit , "Wu, Jingjing" , "Zhang, Helin" , Jerin Jacob , Chao Zhu To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mail-yb0-f169.google.com (mail-yb0-f169.google.com [209.85.213.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E672E8A for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 07:45:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-yb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id m133so707909ybb.1 for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 22:45:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8195227.QCEXF4XZSi@xps13> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 5 April 2017 at 04:22, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2017-04-04 10:30, Ferruh Yigit: >> On 4/4/2017 2:55 AM, Qi Zhang wrote: >> > The patch set create new APIs that help to change the mapping from hardware >> > defined packet type to software defined packet type for i40e NICs. >> > Keep these APIs private is because currently they are only meaningful for >> > devices that support dynamic PTYPE configuration, which may not be a general >> > device feature. > [...] >> > Qi Zhang (3): >> > net/i40e: enable per dev PTYPE mapping table >> > net/i40e: configurable PTYPE mapping >> > app/testpmd: add CL for ptype mapping configure >> >> Series applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks. > > It does not compile for ARM (not tested for POWER): > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_neon.c: In function '_recv_raw_pkts_vec': > 229:2: error: unknown type name 'uint32' > uint32 *ptype_tbl = rxq->vsi->adapter->ptype_tbl; > It must be uint32_t. > Given that > - it changes NEON and Altivec code > - it does not compile on ARM > - there is no Ack from NEON or Altivec maintainers (they were not Cc'ed) > I really doubt it has been tested. > That's why it won't be in RC1. > > If NEON and Altivec maintainers agree, we can give it a chance for RC2. > Other than the above error on ARM: Acked-by: Jianbo Liu > PS: please use --in-reply-to to let us check the discussion history.