Hi Arnd,

Thanks for your comment.

On Mon, 23 May 2022 at 14:48, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:

> On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 5:50 PM Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_of.c
> > @@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> of_platform_serial_table[] = {
> >         { .compatible = "ti,da830-uart", .data = (void *)PORT_DA830, },
> >         { .compatible = "nuvoton,wpcm450-uart", .data = (void
> *)PORT_NPCM, },
> >         { .compatible = "nuvoton,npcm750-uart", .data = (void
> *)PORT_NPCM, },
> > +       { .compatible = "nuvoton,npcm845-uart", .data = (void
> *)PORT_NPCM, },
> >         { /* end of list */ },
>
> If these are compatible devices, it's usually easier to claim
> compatibility with both the specific chip and the older model
> as a fallback, to avoid driver changes. This seems to apply to
> the timer and watchdog devices as well.
>
Just to make sure, Do you mean claim in the device tree?
like

compatible = "nuvoton,npcm845-timer", "nuvoton,npcm-timer";


>        Arnd
>

 Best regards,

Tomer