From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f44.google.com (mail-pj1-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5B8072 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pj1-f44.google.com with SMTP id x33-20020a17090a6c2400b001a63ef25836so1398353pjj.3 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:16:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UuiRv/Aqc9KWf66Wmwy2yVHjihLskj+s11srG8q1vD8=; b=DDH8LvTf1NbwlDisv+efQao95HUsWm01LKrhjJ2uX5etHAjxnlYc1fVorsh9C2tZeZ IZjJyefUE9sV7SNEI3aifqWin72xUpU2BtMndIJi3ywQQBX2XMdIqeYY8510szP8t2sH kdBhiAG5maV3WHr8hudaPmgocYD17sC0B0D26/b8Pbwzr3F117FlSlFBx3SQdqHiOhCS AzK0mVaRm+n9lGW4xPZYMjIFamXjTmcm5QI7QOVxfQm9omv4teemj/fppXRavbXh1qYb 2mUwDH8Lkp2dgVW/pz350uqfUJeZ+MOAK0wy10AUYRh1hsJJ2oVH6yHtRzop5uS3RMQt 86wA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UuiRv/Aqc9KWf66Wmwy2yVHjihLskj+s11srG8q1vD8=; b=EbgPaZ4ONU4CNquSK5V+3Howoo6FRVYSkF5z89S0BsLfJwfn/lumWRahQ60s3byRey MlaS6jB+q9e2GPkuAFAJnXRLKUuXfcVzoSqoQ6Kbo1POK9HYVH702aqILYiPIBpKanAd JtBGCqFIP60afeXYKuev47b10iiLuPaMBwUyc+1C4+5FZKylbe1hvfzML3AB7pw7F2M1 v8jtGRkh9G5uLKBwVFOLxtZHtCPj/gFBi3OfZsKunZQ1bkOhV9zX/rnjLUK6kg7KiDNN QMahOn1zmd1rLX+swqImu3PdXJLpSnlZlEwWnjQH8546Du65eHRnM2epvKkLxIfMvmps O8rQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ZQ/BNnYleg2fV8PrcylJ6nhk4plkmIfdEiXcT4EyB5eZZzvhG 7Cm1gmJbwmpckAYIuLWaFBj0N6t11eC6lrEOJb9v9w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy6oDDE8Tua+O/7LJsaoOuN022Twl1T27YRaF2rK5Jgwv2I/UmljReJn3ItDXvNR8dsDNU53ltbLhzG+bw6RwY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:350f:: with SMTP id ls15mr12425415pjb.220.1635524207375; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:16:47 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211018044054.1779424-1-hch@lst.de> <20211029105139.1194bb7f@canb.auug.org.au> <20211029155524.GE24307@magnolia> In-Reply-To: <20211029155524.GE24307@magnolia> From: Dan Williams Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:16:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: futher decouple DAX from block devices To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Christoph Hellwig , Shiyang Ruan , Mike Snitzer , Ira Weiny , device-mapper development , linux-xfs , Linux NVDIMM , linux-s390 , linux-fsdevel , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4 , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 8:55 AM Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 08:42:29AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 4:52 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:46:31 -0700 Dan Williams wrote: > > > > > > > > My merge resolution is here [1]. Christoph, please have a look. The > > > > rebase and the merge result are both passing my test and I'm now going > > > > to review the individual patches. However, while I do that and collect > > > > acks from DM and EROFS folks, I want to give Stephen a heads up that > > > > this is coming. Primarily I want to see if someone sees a better > > > > strategy to merge this, please let me know, but if not I plan to walk > > > > Stephen and Linus through the resolution. > > > > > > It doesn't look to bad to me (however it is a bit late in the cycle :-( > > > ). Once you are happy, just put it in your tree (some of the conflicts > > > are against the current -rc3 based version of your tree anyway) and I > > > will cope with it on Monday. > > > > Christoph, Darrick, Shiyang, > > > > I'm losing my nerve to try to jam this into v5.16 this late in the > > cycle. > > Always a solid choice to hold off for a little more testing and a little > less anxiety. :) > > I don't usually accept new code patches for iomap after rc4 anyway. > > > I do want to get dax+reflink squared away as soon as possible, > > but that looks like something that needs to build on top of a > > v5.16-rc1 at this point. If Linus does a -rc8 then maybe it would have > > enough soak time, but otherwise I want to take the time to collect the > > acks and queue up some more follow-on cleanups to prepare for > > block-less-dax. > > I think that hwpoison-calls-xfs-rmap patchset is a prerequisite for > dax+reflink anyway, right? /me had concluded both were 5.17 things. Ok, cool, sounds like a plan. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23321C43217 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:16:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C56E1610EA for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:16:51 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org C56E1610EA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A3080D6E; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:16:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DSxfpYRhLLrr; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B06680D60; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00119C0019; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4886C000E for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B5760634 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:16:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I8Gidb0-N52a for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:16:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com (mail-pl1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DCC560618 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id i5so7155208pla.5 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:16:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UuiRv/Aqc9KWf66Wmwy2yVHjihLskj+s11srG8q1vD8=; b=DDH8LvTf1NbwlDisv+efQao95HUsWm01LKrhjJ2uX5etHAjxnlYc1fVorsh9C2tZeZ IZjJyefUE9sV7SNEI3aifqWin72xUpU2BtMndIJi3ywQQBX2XMdIqeYY8510szP8t2sH kdBhiAG5maV3WHr8hudaPmgocYD17sC0B0D26/b8Pbwzr3F117FlSlFBx3SQdqHiOhCS AzK0mVaRm+n9lGW4xPZYMjIFamXjTmcm5QI7QOVxfQm9omv4teemj/fppXRavbXh1qYb 2mUwDH8Lkp2dgVW/pz350uqfUJeZ+MOAK0wy10AUYRh1hsJJ2oVH6yHtRzop5uS3RMQt 86wA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UuiRv/Aqc9KWf66Wmwy2yVHjihLskj+s11srG8q1vD8=; b=G7qmkn0HmH1na1xfpLwnYzyIG4UWoN0nRiHrMv4qCzuFhbJb2T52k3aJ+UP5CmLPzM exaTKheWPO6UTb2fYKxDeJUo65IwUx5VpSQQvBYg16YtNECsMVhNM3mHccfQj+0pWlKB J7cczNIpll/jBXMim159eyRAaZz8/fX8IegRRBAJKLhexN1dz0wvSthSRKbwkmshTJuo 3q5EYwpiiBhutVEvQ8pXcKeK38MOM4IcF2TBuwgbLtgL98ridf7vqmHxP2VTFQTr8l0w JUbB9PS7ONKZ9UzqRoZm/UC1gNjo48FPafR5W7PPyu7Thv3AEdA4UliVL9i5cNHmAzhN XCxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532NLh1b8vmw+tzbVji6KmQ+DrPsg/n8je4V7uLg3GgcMsWTqqY4 rvVmOTH5SsjypXmUNiMZ2oJbEmDv4VFqOrXy1S5kPA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy6oDDE8Tua+O/7LJsaoOuN022Twl1T27YRaF2rK5Jgwv2I/UmljReJn3ItDXvNR8dsDNU53ltbLhzG+bw6RwY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:350f:: with SMTP id ls15mr12425415pjb.220.1635524207375; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:16:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211018044054.1779424-1-hch@lst.de> <20211029105139.1194bb7f@canb.auug.org.au> <20211029155524.GE24307@magnolia> In-Reply-To: <20211029155524.GE24307@magnolia> From: Dan Williams Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:16:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: futher decouple DAX from block devices To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Mike Snitzer , Linux NVDIMM , linux-s390 , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, Shiyang Ruan , linux-xfs , device-mapper development , linux-fsdevel , linux-ext4 , Ira Weiny , Christoph Hellwig , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org X-BeenThere: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux virtualization List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "Virtualization" On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 8:55 AM Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 08:42:29AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 4:52 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:46:31 -0700 Dan Williams wrote: > > > > > > > > My merge resolution is here [1]. Christoph, please have a look. The > > > > rebase and the merge result are both passing my test and I'm now going > > > > to review the individual patches. However, while I do that and collect > > > > acks from DM and EROFS folks, I want to give Stephen a heads up that > > > > this is coming. Primarily I want to see if someone sees a better > > > > strategy to merge this, please let me know, but if not I plan to walk > > > > Stephen and Linus through the resolution. > > > > > > It doesn't look to bad to me (however it is a bit late in the cycle :-( > > > ). Once you are happy, just put it in your tree (some of the conflicts > > > are against the current -rc3 based version of your tree anyway) and I > > > will cope with it on Monday. > > > > Christoph, Darrick, Shiyang, > > > > I'm losing my nerve to try to jam this into v5.16 this late in the > > cycle. > > Always a solid choice to hold off for a little more testing and a little > less anxiety. :) > > I don't usually accept new code patches for iomap after rc4 anyway. > > > I do want to get dax+reflink squared away as soon as possible, > > but that looks like something that needs to build on top of a > > v5.16-rc1 at this point. If Linus does a -rc8 then maybe it would have > > enough soak time, but otherwise I want to take the time to collect the > > acks and queue up some more follow-on cleanups to prepare for > > block-less-dax. > > I think that hwpoison-calls-xfs-rmap patchset is a prerequisite for > dax+reflink anyway, right? /me had concluded both were 5.17 things. Ok, cool, sounds like a plan. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823CEC433F5 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F376360C4B for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:17:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org F376360C4B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-94-v3y5Zx3QM86ideEun4C5yQ-1; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 12:16:59 -0400 X-MC-Unique: v3y5Zx3QM86ideEun4C5yQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BA7110151E0; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 148A15F4EC; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.19.33]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880BE4EA2F; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:16:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.1]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 19TGGogR025611 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 12:16:50 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 77B0D40CFD10; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast06.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.22]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 712D340CFD0B for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B3DA18A01A5 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pl1-f178.google.com (mail-pl1-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-280-3oepyvyaNRCIzpIFJMtAzg-1; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 12:16:48 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 3oepyvyaNRCIzpIFJMtAzg-1 Received: by mail-pl1-f178.google.com with SMTP id t21so7145224plr.6 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:16:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UuiRv/Aqc9KWf66Wmwy2yVHjihLskj+s11srG8q1vD8=; b=I2J1b4//CnEL2LqOzKVfkEkRByVYCbK7yhr/te6+ZbzKjoBAqlLIWxNRGnnnT72ja/ CEIPNMEo46YxjZYhtHbcfoozn00y+jRfZSBwAnFJUayEfiAMa5BJ/Gh9Ods/Je6pYXBI jLTIZDU0fwIt31rTVkT4GMDQMo1Z6NGWqCL9vH99wHX2lCz6FvN0T1U2M3TMCEWNfa9X 2VayV5Q29CxSG69Mdk0wSvRdxpx8WMYppGv2nll01UH45ZYDgprbPCa9Xtqhnh4O7GK4 zAuELWqJjjaiEZ2JuMAOANDC12Ny2q1zXRzniJJ9i9uwbj4PVpvo1AUtvgLlzF2DFjsy 7kBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5312orKyoVy4AZKefCAx0IXdKq0KsS+iHGqDN3N6B0qHusMq4hKf dsprJrD1qAsFuv8UEgv0CrihH3JFK2rubXbJAwxp35Ovh/0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy6oDDE8Tua+O/7LJsaoOuN022Twl1T27YRaF2rK5Jgwv2I/UmljReJn3ItDXvNR8dsDNU53ltbLhzG+bw6RwY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:350f:: with SMTP id ls15mr12425415pjb.220.1635524207375; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:16:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211018044054.1779424-1-hch@lst.de> <20211029105139.1194bb7f@canb.auug.org.au> <20211029155524.GE24307@magnolia> In-Reply-To: <20211029155524.GE24307@magnolia> From: Dan Williams Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:16:35 -0700 Message-ID: To: "Darrick J. Wong" X-Mimecast-Impersonation-Protect: Policy=CLT - Impersonation Protection Definition; Similar Internal Domain=false; Similar Monitored External Domain=false; Custom External Domain=false; Mimecast External Domain=false; Newly Observed Domain=false; Internal User Name=false; Custom Display Name List=false; Reply-to Address Mismatch=false; Targeted Threat Dictionary=false; Mimecast Threat Dictionary=false; Custom Threat Dictionary=false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.11.54.1 X-loop: dm-devel@redhat.com Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Mike Snitzer , Linux NVDIMM , linux-s390 , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, Shiyang Ruan , linux-xfs , device-mapper development , linux-fsdevel , linux-ext4 , Ira Weiny , Christoph Hellwig , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [dm-devel] futher decouple DAX from block devices X-BeenThere: dm-devel@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk List-Id: device-mapper development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 8:55 AM Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 08:42:29AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 4:52 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:46:31 -0700 Dan Williams wrote: > > > > > > > > My merge resolution is here [1]. Christoph, please have a look. The > > > > rebase and the merge result are both passing my test and I'm now going > > > > to review the individual patches. However, while I do that and collect > > > > acks from DM and EROFS folks, I want to give Stephen a heads up that > > > > this is coming. Primarily I want to see if someone sees a better > > > > strategy to merge this, please let me know, but if not I plan to walk > > > > Stephen and Linus through the resolution. > > > > > > It doesn't look to bad to me (however it is a bit late in the cycle :-( > > > ). Once you are happy, just put it in your tree (some of the conflicts > > > are against the current -rc3 based version of your tree anyway) and I > > > will cope with it on Monday. > > > > Christoph, Darrick, Shiyang, > > > > I'm losing my nerve to try to jam this into v5.16 this late in the > > cycle. > > Always a solid choice to hold off for a little more testing and a little > less anxiety. :) > > I don't usually accept new code patches for iomap after rc4 anyway. > > > I do want to get dax+reflink squared away as soon as possible, > > but that looks like something that needs to build on top of a > > v5.16-rc1 at this point. If Linus does a -rc8 then maybe it would have > > enough soak time, but otherwise I want to take the time to collect the > > acks and queue up some more follow-on cleanups to prepare for > > block-less-dax. > > I think that hwpoison-calls-xfs-rmap patchset is a prerequisite for > dax+reflink anyway, right? /me had concluded both were 5.17 things. Ok, cool, sounds like a plan. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59674C433EF for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:17:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5D816044F for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:17:02 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org B5D816044F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Hgncs2Tkbz305T for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 03:17:01 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.i=@intel-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=DDH8LvTf; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=intel.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e; helo=mail-pl1-x62e.google.com; envelope-from=dan.j.williams@intel.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.i=@intel-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=DDH8LvTf; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com (mail-pl1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hgncn2Mx0z2xDr for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 03:16:50 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id y1so7134361plk.10 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:16:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UuiRv/Aqc9KWf66Wmwy2yVHjihLskj+s11srG8q1vD8=; b=DDH8LvTf1NbwlDisv+efQao95HUsWm01LKrhjJ2uX5etHAjxnlYc1fVorsh9C2tZeZ IZjJyefUE9sV7SNEI3aifqWin72xUpU2BtMndIJi3ywQQBX2XMdIqeYY8510szP8t2sH kdBhiAG5maV3WHr8hudaPmgocYD17sC0B0D26/b8Pbwzr3F117FlSlFBx3SQdqHiOhCS AzK0mVaRm+n9lGW4xPZYMjIFamXjTmcm5QI7QOVxfQm9omv4teemj/fppXRavbXh1qYb 2mUwDH8Lkp2dgVW/pz350uqfUJeZ+MOAK0wy10AUYRh1hsJJ2oVH6yHtRzop5uS3RMQt 86wA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UuiRv/Aqc9KWf66Wmwy2yVHjihLskj+s11srG8q1vD8=; b=h31gPR2YaLj659U3ysHgZ2wqepSvg+OeNZpeAU11YazBfjAHQkxXhyMCTR0mXc5yhd cmFWXi+G7zcCqIuPpbTnKZNT9JEVnbRBB8T2zH9tslAojpSGtWrotlGpMoDPV3bqqBPa cgY9z79dHTCLw6SXQ/kyWun8K61iuoHxNoJxHeyG+Nt6+r3PHAOahDyoVEM/Ge6dr5s1 RYK8l8YzSx1H0UwSfB1Leq4j9Ehz0WfR7e8S2mT2XE3u/FdzJnc0c5U5gl++JdkNXNSh xs65tvga53PRpUaW23ht3XK73dPxZGf1COTRBgubkNJQmyG1CRB/XYN7ZjrcKw6FSwsA tltg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5305N/uzuykt9Z6Y5z4hmjHHpUQeK98vHI0bVJ10Q0CAXv2dNngY xUeMg6G/GSbrhHOt5iLZy35m/VKYRsMNW3jrYOAYhg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy6oDDE8Tua+O/7LJsaoOuN022Twl1T27YRaF2rK5Jgwv2I/UmljReJn3ItDXvNR8dsDNU53ltbLhzG+bw6RwY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:350f:: with SMTP id ls15mr12425415pjb.220.1635524207375; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:16:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211018044054.1779424-1-hch@lst.de> <20211029105139.1194bb7f@canb.auug.org.au> <20211029155524.GE24307@magnolia> In-Reply-To: <20211029155524.GE24307@magnolia> From: Dan Williams Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:16:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: futher decouple DAX from block devices To: "Darrick J. Wong" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Linux EROFS file system List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Mike Snitzer , Linux NVDIMM , linux-s390 , linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, Shiyang Ruan , linux-xfs , device-mapper development , linux-fsdevel , linux-ext4 , Ira Weiny , Christoph Hellwig , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-erofs-bounces+linux-erofs=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linux-erofs" On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 8:55 AM Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 08:42:29AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 4:52 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:46:31 -0700 Dan Williams wrote: > > > > > > > > My merge resolution is here [1]. Christoph, please have a look. The > > > > rebase and the merge result are both passing my test and I'm now going > > > > to review the individual patches. However, while I do that and collect > > > > acks from DM and EROFS folks, I want to give Stephen a heads up that > > > > this is coming. Primarily I want to see if someone sees a better > > > > strategy to merge this, please let me know, but if not I plan to walk > > > > Stephen and Linus through the resolution. > > > > > > It doesn't look to bad to me (however it is a bit late in the cycle :-( > > > ). Once you are happy, just put it in your tree (some of the conflicts > > > are against the current -rc3 based version of your tree anyway) and I > > > will cope with it on Monday. > > > > Christoph, Darrick, Shiyang, > > > > I'm losing my nerve to try to jam this into v5.16 this late in the > > cycle. > > Always a solid choice to hold off for a little more testing and a little > less anxiety. :) > > I don't usually accept new code patches for iomap after rc4 anyway. > > > I do want to get dax+reflink squared away as soon as possible, > > but that looks like something that needs to build on top of a > > v5.16-rc1 at this point. If Linus does a -rc8 then maybe it would have > > enough soak time, but otherwise I want to take the time to collect the > > acks and queue up some more follow-on cleanups to prepare for > > block-less-dax. > > I think that hwpoison-calls-xfs-rmap patchset is a prerequisite for > dax+reflink anyway, right? /me had concluded both were 5.17 things. Ok, cool, sounds like a plan.