From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5364DC47094 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D496136D for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231467AbhFJPUb (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 11:20:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:42826 "EHLO mail-pf1-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231374AbhFJPUa (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 11:20:30 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f174.google.com with SMTP id s14so1878120pfd.9 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 08:18:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mS2MKuQ1MIt5zD53BiXmwH5v3s+3aSWZOMRcLFPuyQQ=; b=aQo9cpvxebrDYW33Evapw/yzHiQs2RxOy61K7n6IgoUxXfISlrgVfdnJDR4OZgqovP yYwwBdVs3foftayF4m2A9wfEOAncKKn2BRzh1HtIvcmSvLMtsw/HHxtzrcY1+psDLHsc 40TLCaGdp6NniC1rGVV5GIPP6vudH01wEdeJmKMaXJ95lJq3OLJDIqsTRGzNTM4OJrpa DwZpfxIW+A4Mqvse8uOyl2SMZ8N6V+1Oi9kbUwhek03aEk400N9J9eKocfp3NckjiLen FCAX3l3f1J1Ln8lqWl6H4IoUj9GnbnYM3FT3hXAZR6WPQh4m/nDjCW4F0zDww18ZIQEC WcRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mS2MKuQ1MIt5zD53BiXmwH5v3s+3aSWZOMRcLFPuyQQ=; b=CtjlrfHiYoT1fOp5mNTzxvdnsJajqdcNCt0snUSZF5uuRlLs/SG+lkZH24gT1KA/Qa eDsmLyHA96QMVM21BdIP4F0JOPTU5JKJ3uQzqFQeHO4irhAtnwlf9JawvHMhhJClJns2 e9IVXyTMgJn757t1CTgSPZHv9W8BPNRNd3tpx+rw2wlssbaLFy/62K/0wYl/YCEt5ET9 uu+9VwrdIrusLfgkpgi7M9CSE5y83iq3fNnHVmewqCxvtsEY3ymDI7dQbNz4D608Opur 17fFIHK9ItnTeLo6vEbA8lqDRg6Q+rczla4e13bFmABafvC0UPny1dgax0gU3ts1bgBP 5cjA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530onxgv4U9L8UOx9CyIXp18NuAKUXX++xjUg2j+2byq2F3nMw1r HUTnW+P0DfnCnwEdQRvwx9PTgJFUxTGhVcZpNTvHPA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwEZL6AolcfQZhCtpeWi9L4JRznxZSkG0jfVSTQeMveEIT9vlfwlPBapoWue5ubB3fyFFQoiZkPFIhMAYJAY0g= X-Received: by 2002:a62:8287:0:b029:2ec:9b1f:9c0a with SMTP id w129-20020a6282870000b02902ec9b1f9c0amr3541997pfd.31.1623338254593; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 08:17:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210524133938.2815206-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> <20210524133938.2815206-2-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20210524133938.2815206-2-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> From: Dan Williams Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 08:17:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: Add vendor ID for the PCI SIG To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Linux PCI , linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , "Weiny, Ira" , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Ben Widawsky , Chris Browy , Linux ACPI , "Schofield, Alison" , Vishal L Verma , Fangjian , Linuxarm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 6:41 AM Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > This ID is used in DOE headers to identify protocols that are defined > within the PCI Express Base Specification. > > Specified in Table 7-x2 of the Data Object Exchange ECN (approved 12 March > 2020) available from https://members.pcisig.com/wg/PCI-SIG/document/14143 > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron > --- > include/linux/pci_ids.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h > index 4c3fa5293d76..dcc8b4b14198 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h > +++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h > @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ > #define PCI_CLASS_OTHERS 0xff > > /* Vendors and devices. Sort key: vendor first, device next. */ > +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_PCI_SIG 0x0001 Should this not be: PCI_DOE_VENDOR_ID_PCI_SIG? ...because I don't think this value will ever show up at the typical config-offset 0 vendor-id, will it?