From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 15:51:31 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] fdtdec: Implement fdtdec_get_max_phandle()
In-Reply-To: <20190308201140.2383-2-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
References: <20190308201140.2383-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
 <20190308201140.2383-2-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAPnjgZ2YAgGYJQRr6Jv2QX87g45nCkv6i-n2AZ6zAN9Thsz7aQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Thierry,

On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 13:11, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>
> This function allows looking up the highest phandle value stored in a
> device tree, which is useful to determine the next best phandle value
> for new nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  include/fdtdec.h | 12 ++++++++++++
>  lib/fdtdec.c     | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)

Can we use fdt_get_max_phandle() instead? If not, could you please add
a bit more detail to the commit message as we might consider changing
the upstream function.

Regards,
Simon